<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl.xml"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
    <title>Changes in Makefile</title>
    <link>http://nxr.netbsd.org/rss/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2005</copyright>
    <generator>Java</generator>
    
<item>
    <title>adapt to ${CC_WNO_ADDRESS_OF_PACKED_MEMBER}<br/><br/>Simplify CWARNFLAGS to use ${CC_WNO_ADDRESS_OF_PACKED_MEMBER}<br/>which works for both clang and gcc, and remove compiler-specific<br/>equivalents.</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.6</description>
    <pubDate>Sat Jun 03 21:26:28 UTC 2023</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lukem</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>bsd.own.mk: rename to CC_WNO_ADDRESS_OF_PACKED_MEMBER<br/><br/>Provide a single variable<br/>	CC_WNO_ADDRESS_OF_PACKED_MEMBER<br/>with options for both clang and gcc, to replace<br/>	CLANG_NO_ADDR_OF_PACKED_MEMBER<br/>	CC_NO_ADDR_OF_PACKED_MEMBER<br/>	GCC_NO_ADDR_OF_PACKED_MEMBER<br/><br/>Using the convention CC_compilerflag, where compilerflag<br/>is based on the full compiler flag name.</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.5</description>
    <pubDate>Sat Jun 03 08:52:56 UTC 2023</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lukem</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>add support for new GCC 9 warnings that may be too much to fix<br/>right now.  new address-of-packed-member and format-overflow<br/>warnings have new GCC_NO_ADDR_OF_PACKED_MEMBER amd<br/>GCC_NO_FORMAT_OVERFLOW variables to remove these warnings.<br/><br/>apply to a bunch of the tree.  mostly, these are real bugs that<br/>should be fixed, but in many cases, only by removing the 'packed'<br/>attribute from some structure that doesn't really need it.  (i<br/>looked at many different ones, and while perhaps 60-80% were<br/>already properly aligned, it wasn't clear to me that the uses<br/>were always coming from sane data vs network alignment, so it<br/>doesn't seem safe to remove packed without careful research for<br/>each affect struct.)  clang already warned (and was not erroring)<br/>for many of these cases, but gcc picked up dozens more.</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.4</description>
    <pubDate>Sun Sep 06 07:20:29 UTC 2020</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mrg</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>Fix clang build after packed lfs64 accessor change.</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.3</description>
    <pubDate>Sat Mar 21 18:43:47 UTC 2020</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>riastradh</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>Add multiboot 2 support to x86 bootloaders<br/><br/>multiboot 2 is required to boot Xen on an EFI system.<br/>This also require a kernel patch for properly discovering<br/>the ACPI RSDP, which is available after 20190912, in<br/>src/sys/arch/x86/acpi/acpi_machdep.c 1.26-1.28<br/><br/>There are a few missing bit in this multiboot 2 implementation<br/>(which are unused by Xen):<br/>- Header tags Address, Freambuffer, and Relocatable are ignored<br/>- Tags APM and Network are not provided<br/>- Tags ACPI old and ACP new are only provided for ACPI boot<br/>- Tag boot device does not provides the subpart (BSD disklabel partition)<br/><br/>Notes:<br/>- multiboot2 is disabled in dosboot, otherwise the binary<br/>  gets too big and build fails.<br/>- in src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot, consinit() is renamed<br/>  as efi_consinit() to avoid prototype conflicts in src/sys/sys/systm.h</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.2</description>
    <pubDate>Fri Sep 13 02:19:46 UTC 2019</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>manu</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>branches:  1.1.2;  1.1.4;  1.1.8;  1.1.12;  1.1.18;  1.1.22;  1.1.26;<br/>Initial commit of native amd64 EFI boot loader.</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.1</description>
    <pubDate>Tue Jan 24 11:09:14 UTC 2017</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nonaka</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>Pull up following revision(s) (requested by riastradh in ticket #1050):<br/><br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_subr.c: revision 1.101<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_subr.c: revision 1.102<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_inode.c: revision 1.158<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_inode.h: revision 1.25<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_balloc.c: revision 1.95<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_pages.c: revision 1.21<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vnops.c: revision 1.330<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_alloc.c: revision 1.140 (patch)<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_alloc.c: revision 1.141 (patch)<br/>	lib/libp2k/p2k.c: revision 1.72<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs.h: revision 1.205<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs.h: revision 1.206<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_segment.c: revision 1.284<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs.h: revision 1.207<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_segment.c: revision 1.285<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_debug.c: revision 1.55<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_rename.c: revision 1.23<br/>	usr.sbin/dumplfs/dumplfs.c: revision 1.65<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vfsops.c: revision 1.371<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile: revision 1.3<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vfsops.c: revision 1.372<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vfsops.c: revision 1.373<br/>	sbin/fsck_lfs/pass1.c: revision 1.46<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vnops.c: revision 1.326<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vnops.c: revision 1.327<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vfsops.c: revision 1.375 (patch)<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vnops.c: revision 1.328<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_subr.c: revision 1.98<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_extern.h: revision 1.116<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vnops.c: revision 1.329<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_subr.c: revision 1.99<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_extern.h: revision 1.117<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_accessors.h: revision 1.49<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_extern.h: revision 1.118<br/>	sys/rump/fs/lib/liblfs/Makefile: revision 1.15<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_bio.c: revision 1.146 (patch)<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_bio.c: revision 1.147<br/>	sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_subr.c: revision 1.100<br/><br/>Fix kassert in lfs by initializing vp first.<br/><br/>Use a marker node to iterate lfs_dchainhd / i_lfs_dchain.<br/><br/>I believe elements can be removed while the lock is dropped,<br/>including the next node we're hanging on to.<br/><br/>Just use VOP_BWRITE for lfs_bwrite_log.<br/>Hope this doesn't cause trouble with vfs_suspend.<br/><br/>Teach lfs to transition ro&lt;-&gt;rw.<br/><br/>Prevent new dirops while we issue lfs_flush_dirops.<br/><br/>lfs_flush_dirops assumes (by KASSERT((ip-&gt;i_state &amp; IN_ADIROP) == 0))<br/>that vnodes on the dchain will not become involved in active dirops<br/>even while holding no other locks (lfs_lock, v_interlock), so we must<br/>set lfs_writer here.  All other callers already set lfs_writer.<br/><br/>We set fs-&gt;lfs_writer++ without explicitly doing lfs_writer_enter<br/>because<br/>(a) we already waited for the dirops to drain, and<br/>(b) we hold lfs_lock and cannot drop it before setting lfs_writer.<br/><br/>Assert lfs_writer where I think we can now prove it.<br/><br/>Serialize access to the splay tree with lfs_lock.<br/><br/>Change some cheap KDASSERT into KASSERT.<br/><br/>Take a reference and fix assertions in lfs_flush_dirops.<br/>Fixes panic:<br/>KASSERT((ip-&gt;i_state &amp; IN_ADIROP) == 0) at lfs_vnops.c:1670<br/>lfs_flush_dirops<br/>lfs_check<br/>lfs_setattr<br/>VOP_SETATTR<br/>change_mode<br/>sys_fchmod<br/>syscall<br/><br/>This assertion -- and the assertion that vp-&gt;v_uflag has VU_DIROP set<br/>-- is valid only until we release lfs_lock, because we may race with<br/>lfs_unmark_dirop which will remove the nodes and change the flags.<br/><br/>Further, vp itself is valid only as long as it is referenced, which it<br/>is as long as it's on the dchain, but lfs_unmark_dirop drops the<br/>dchain's reference.<br/><br/>Don't lfs_writer_enter while holding v_interlock.<br/><br/>There's no need to lfs_writer_enter at all here, as far as I can see.<br/>lfs_flush_fs will do it for us.<br/><br/>Break deadlock in PR kern/52301.<br/><br/>The lock order is lfs_writer -&gt; lfs_seglock.  The problem in 52301 is<br/>that lfs_segwrite violates this lock order by sometimes doing<br/>lfs_seglock -&gt; lfs_writer, either (a) when doing a checkpoint or (b),<br/>opportunistically, when there are no dirops pending.  Both cases can<br/>deadlock, because dirops sometimes take the seglock (lfs_truncate,<br/>lfs_valloc, lfs_vfree):<br/>(a) There may be dirops pending, and they may be waiting for the<br/>seglock, so we can't wait for them to complete while holding the<br/>seglock.<br/>(b) The test for fs-&gt;lfs_dirops == 0 happens unlocked, and the state<br/>may change by the time lfs_writer_enter acquires lfs_lock.<br/><br/>To resolve this in each case:<br/>(a) Do lfs_writer_enter before lfs_seglock, since we will need it<br/>unconditionally anyway.  The worst performance impact of this should<br/>be that some dirops get delayed a little bit.<br/>(b) Create a new lfs_writer_tryenter to use at this point so that the<br/>test for fs-&gt;lfs_dirops == 0 and the acquisition of lfs_writer happen<br/>atomically under lfs_lock.<br/><br/>Initialize/destroy lfs_allclean_wakeup in modcmd, not lfs_mountfs.<br/><br/>Fixes reloading lfs.kmod.<br/><br/>In lfs_update, hold lfs_writer around lfs_vflush.<br/><br/>Otherwise, we might do<br/>lfs_vflush<br/>-&gt; lfs_seglock<br/>-&gt; lfs_segwait(SEGM_CKP)<br/>   -&gt; lfs_writer_enter<br/>which is the reverse of the lfs_writer -&gt; lfs_seglock ordering.<br/><br/>Call lfs_orphan in lfs_rename while we're still in the dirop.<br/>lfs_writer_enter can't fail; keep it simple and don't pretend it can.<br/><br/>Assert that mtsleep can't fail either -- it doesn't catch signals and<br/>there's no timeout.<br/><br/>Teach LFS_ORPHAN_NEXTFREE about lfs64.<br/><br/>Dust off the orphan detection code and try to make it work.<br/><br/>Fix !DIAGNOSTIC compile<br/><br/>Fix userland references to LFS_ORPHAN_NEXTFREE.<br/><br/>Forgot to grep for these or do a full distribution build, oops!<br/><br/>Fix missing &lt;sys/evcnt.h&gt; by removing the evcnts instead.<br/><br/>Just wanted to confirm that a race might happen, and indeed it did.<br/>These serve little diagnostic value otherwise.<br/><br/>OR into bp-&gt;b_cflags; don't overwrite.<br/><br/>CTASSERT lfs on-disk structure sizes.<br/><br/>Avoid misaligned access to lfs64 on-disk records in memory.<br/>lfs64 directory entries are only 32-bit aligned in order to conserve<br/>space in directory blocks, and we had a hack to stuff a 64-bit inode<br/>in them.  This replaces the hack by __aligned(4) __packed, and goes<br/>further:<br/><br/>1. It's not clear that all the other lfs64 data structures are 64-bit<br/>   aligned on disk to begin with.  We can go through these later and<br/>   upgrade them from<br/>        struct foo64 {<br/>                ...<br/>        } __aligned(4) __packed;<br/>        union foo {<br/>                struct foo64 f64;<br/>                ...<br/>        };<br/>   to<br/>        struct foo64 {<br/>                ...<br/>        };<br/>        union foo {<br/>                struct foo64 f64 __aligned(8);<br/>                ...<br/>        } __aligned(4) __packed;<br/>   if we really want to take advantage of 64-bit memory accesses.<br/>   However, the __aligned(4) __packed must remain on the union<br/>   because:<br/>2. We access even the lfs32 data structures via a union that has<br/>   lfs64 members, and it turns out that compilers will assume access<br/>   through a union with 64-bit aligned members implies the whole<br/>   union has 64-bit alignment, even if we're only accessing a 32-bit<br/>   aligned member.<br/><br/>Fix clang build after packed lfs64 accessor change.<br/><br/>Suppress spurious address-of-packed error in rump lfs too.</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.1.26.2</description>
    <pubDate>Mon Aug 17 10:30:22 UTC 2020</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>Pull up following revision(s) (requested by manu in ticket #203):<br/><br/>	sys/arch/i386/include/multiboot2.h: revision 1.1<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/exec.c: revision 1.74<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/efiboot.c: revision 1.11<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootia32/multiboot32.S: revision 1.1<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/biosdisk.c: revision 1.52<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/efibootx64.c: revision 1.5<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/eficons.c: revision 1.7<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootia32/efibootia32.c: revision 1.5<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/libi386.h: revision 1.45<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/bootinfo_memmap.c: revision 1.6<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/pread.c: revision 1.8<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/efiboot.h: revision 1.10<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootia32/Makefile: revision 1.3<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/Makefile: revision 1.47<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile: revision 1.2<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/multiboot.S: revision 1.3<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/multiboot64.S: revision 1.1<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/efimemory.c: revision 1.9<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/boot.c: revision 1.16<br/>	sys/arch/i386/include/Makefile: revision 1.50<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/Makefile.efiboot: revision 1.16<br/>	share/man/man8/man8.x86/boot.8: revision 1.20<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/boot/Makefile.boot: revision 1.73<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/pxeboot/Makefile: revision 1.26<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/exec_multiboot1.c: revision 1.1<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/netboot/Makefile.netboot: revision 1.11<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/exec_multiboot2.c: revision 1.1<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/biosdisk.h: revision 1.12<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/exec_multiboot2.c: revision 1.2<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/dosboot/Makefile: revision 1.32<br/><br/>Add multiboot 2 support to x86 bootloaders<br/><br/>multiboot 2 is required to boot Xen on an EFI system.<br/><br/>This also require a kernel patch for properly discovering<br/>the ACPI RSDP, which is available after 20190912, in<br/>src/sys/arch/x86/acpi/acpi_machdep.c 1.26-1.28<br/><br/>There are a few missing bit in this multiboot 2 implementation<br/>(which are unused by Xen):<br/>- Header tags Address, Freambuffer, and Relocatable are ignored<br/>- Tags APM and Network are not provided<br/>- Tags ACPI old and ACP new are only provided for ACPI boot<br/>- Tag boot device does not provides the subpart (BSD disklabel partition)<br/>Notes:<br/>- multiboot2 is disabled in dosboot, otherwise the binary<br/>  gets too big and build fails.<br/>- in src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot, consinit() is renamed<br/>  as efi_consinit() to avoid prototype conflicts in src/sys/sys/systm.h<br/><br/>Remove debug define.<br/><br/>It remained there unseen because it was misspelled!<br/><br/>Remove obsoeolete BUGS note that UEFI bootloader does not support multiboot</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.1.26.1</description>
    <pubDate>Tue Sep 17 19:32:00 UTC 2019</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>Mostly merge changes from HEAD upto 20200411</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.1.22.2</description>
    <pubDate>Mon Apr 13 08:03:54 UTC 2020</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>Merge changes from current as of 20200406</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.1.22.1</description>
    <pubDate>Wed Apr 08 14:07:41 UTC 2020</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>update from HEAD</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.1.18.2</description>
    <pubDate>Sun Dec 03 11:36:19 UTC 2017</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jdolecek</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>file Makefile was added on branch tls-maxphys on 2017-12-03 11:36:19 +0000</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.1.18.1</description>
    <pubDate>Tue Jan 24 11:09:14 UTC 2017</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jdolecek</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>Pull up following revision(s) [adapted, via patch]<br/>(requested by manu in ticket #1382):<br/><br/>	sys/arch/i386/include/multiboot2.h: revision 1.1<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/exec.c: revision 1.74<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/efiboot.c: revision 1.11<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootia32/multiboot32.S: revision 1.1<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/biosdisk.c: revision 1.52<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/efibootx64.c: revision 1.5<br/>	distrib/sets/lists/comp/md.amd64: revision 1.273<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/eficons.c: revision 1.7<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootia32/efibootia32.c: revision 1.5<br/>	distrib/sets/lists/comp/md.i386: revision 1.191<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/libi386.h: revision 1.45<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/bootinfo_memmap.c: revision 1.6<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/pread.c: revision 1.8<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/efiboot.h: revision 1.10<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootia32/Makefile: revision 1.3<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/Makefile: revision 1.47<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile: revision 1.2<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/multiboot.S: revision 1.3<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/multiboot64.S: revision 1.1<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/efimemory.c: revision 1.9<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/boot.c: revision 1.16<br/>	sys/arch/i386/include/Makefile: revision 1.50<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/Makefile.efiboot: revision 1.16<br/>	share/man/man8/man8.x86/boot.8: revision 1.20<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/boot/Makefile.boot: revision 1.73<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/pxeboot/Makefile: revision 1.26<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/exec_multiboot1.c: revision 1.1<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/netboot/Makefile.netboot: revision 1.11<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/exec_multiboot2.c: revision 1.1<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/biosdisk.h: revision 1.12<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/exec_multiboot2.c: revision 1.2<br/>	sys/arch/i386/stand/dosboot/Makefile: revision 1.32<br/>	sys/external/bsd/gnu-efi/dist/inc/efiapi.h (apply patch)<br/><br/>Add multiboot 2 support to x86 bootloaders<br/><br/>multiboot 2 is required to boot Xen on an EFI system.<br/><br/>This also require a kernel patch for properly discovering<br/>the ACPI RSDP, which is available after 20190912, in<br/>src/sys/arch/x86/acpi/acpi_machdep.c 1.26-1.28<br/><br/>There are a few missing bit in this multiboot 2 implementation<br/>(which are unused by Xen):<br/>- Header tags Address, Freambuffer, and Relocatable are ignored<br/>- Tags APM and Network are not provided<br/>- Tags ACPI old and ACP new are only provided for ACPI boot<br/>- Tag boot device does not provides the subpart (BSD disklabel partition)<br/><br/>Notes:<br/>- multiboot2 is disabled in dosboot, otherwise the binary<br/>  gets too big and build fails.<br/>- in src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot, consinit() is renamed<br/>  as efi_consinit() to avoid prototype conflicts in src/sys/sys/systm.h<br/><br/>Remove debug define.<br/><br/>It remained there unseen because it was misspelled!<br/><br/>Remove obsoeolete BUGS note that UEFI bootloader does not support multiboot<br/><br/>Add new multiboot2.h header.</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.1.12.1</description>
    <pubDate>Wed Sep 18 17:30:05 UTC 2019</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>1468398</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.1.8.2</description>
    <pubDate>Tue Jan 24 11:09:15 UTC 2017</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nonaka</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>file Makefile was added on branch bouyer-socketcan on 2017-01-24 11:09:15 +0000</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.1.8.1</description>
    <pubDate>Tue Jan 24 11:09:14 UTC 2017</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nonaka</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>Sync with HEAD</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.1.4.2</description>
    <pubDate>Mon Mar 20 06:57:15 UTC 2017</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pgoyette</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>file Makefile was added on branch pgoyette-localcount on 2017-03-20 06:57:15 +0000</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.1.4.1</description>
    <pubDate>Tue Jan 24 11:09:14 UTC 2017</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pgoyette</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>Sync with HEAD</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.1.2.2</description>
    <pubDate>Sun Feb 05 13:40:13 UTC 2017</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>skrll</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
    <title>file Makefile was added on branch nick-nhusb on 2017-02-05 13:40:13 +0000</title>
    <description>/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile - 1.1.2.1</description>
    <pubDate>Tue Jan 24 11:09:14 UTC 2017</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>skrll</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel></rss>

