| History log of /src/sys/arch/m68k/include/vmparam.h |
| Revision | | Date | Author | Comments |
| 1.1 |
| 01-Feb-2020 |
tsutsui | branches: 1.1.2; 1.1.4; 1.1.8;
Add MAX/MIN PAGE_SIZE and PAGE_SHIFT definitions of m68k for jemalloc(3).
Background:
- All m68k ports have fixed PAGE_SIZE value in their kernels,
but each port uses different PAGE_SIZE value (4096 or 8192)
due to historical reasons.
- Currently module(7) binaries are built per each port so
all m68k kernel sources don't support run-time variable PAGE_SIZE.
- MI <uvm/uvm_param.h> assumes that the port supports a variable
PAGE_SIZE on module(7) builds if both MAX_PAGE_SIZE and MIN_PAGE_SIZE
are defined and they have different values.
- On the other hand, jemalloc(3) checks MAX_PAGE_SHIFT in
src/external/bsd/jemalloc/include/jemalloc/internal/jemalloc_internal_defs.h
for internal optimization.
- m68k ports share userland binaries (especially pkgsrc binaries)
among all ports, so we need to define MAX_PAGE_SHIFT as 13 to
support m68k ports where PAGE_SIZE==8192.
(though this would affect only if static binaries built on
4k page hosts are executed on 8k page hosts)
To solve these inconsistency on PAGE_SIZE definitions,
we should have an independent PAGE_SIZE related definitions
for userland, but it requires major reorganization.
For now (especially for netbsd-9) we define MAX/MIN PAGE_SIZE and
PAGE_SHIFT values in <m68k/vmparam.h> only in !defined(_KERNEL) case.
Discussed on source-changes-d@ and tech-kern@ with christos@ and thorpej@:
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes-d/2020/01/thread1.html#012035
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2020/01/thread1.html#025954
Should be pulled up to netbsd-9.
|
| 1.1.8.2 |
| 08-Apr-2020 |
martin | Merge changes from current as of 20200406
|
| 1.1.8.1 |
| 01-Feb-2020 |
martin | file vmparam.h was added on branch phil-wifi on 2020-04-08 14:07:43 +0000
|
| 1.1.4.2 |
| 29-Feb-2020 |
ad | Sync with head.
|
| 1.1.4.1 |
| 01-Feb-2020 |
ad | file vmparam.h was added on branch ad-namecache on 2020-02-29 20:18:25 +0000
|
| 1.1.2.2 |
| 10-Feb-2020 |
martin | Pull up following revision(s) (requested by tsutsui in ticket #682):
sys/arch/next68k/include/vmparam.h: revision 1.27
sys/arch/mac68k/include/vmparam.h: revision 1.46
sys/arch/sun3/include/vmparam.h: revision 1.38
sys/arch/m68k/include/vmparam.h: revision 1.1
sys/arch/hp300/include/vmparam.h: revision 1.41
sys/arch/m68k/include/Makefile: revision 1.32
sys/arch/amiga/include/vmparam.h: revision 1.48
distrib/sets/lists/comp/ad.m68k: revision 1.63
sys/arch/x68k/include/vmparam.h: revision 1.40
sys/arch/mvme68k/include/vmparam.h: revision 1.38
sys/arch/luna68k/include/vmparam.h: revision 1.23
sys/arch/news68k/include/vmparam.h: revision 1.23
sys/arch/atari/include/vmparam.h: revision 1.34
sys/arch/cesfic/include/vmparam.h: revision 1.19
Add MAX/MIN PAGE_SIZE and PAGE_SHIFT definitions of m68k for jemalloc(3).
Background:
- All m68k ports have fixed PAGE_SIZE value in their kernels,
but each port uses different PAGE_SIZE value (4096 or 8192)
due to historical reasons.
- Currently module(7) binaries are built per each port so
all m68k kernel sources don't support run-time variable PAGE_SIZE.
- MI <uvm/uvm_param.h> assumes that the port supports a variable
PAGE_SIZE on module(7) builds if both MAX_PAGE_SIZE and MIN_PAGE_SIZE
are defined and they have different values.
- On the other hand, jemalloc(3) checks MAX_PAGE_SHIFT in
src/external/bsd/jemalloc/include/jemalloc/internal/jemalloc_internal_defs.h
for internal optimization.
- m68k ports share userland binaries (especially pkgsrc binaries)
among all ports, so we need to define MAX_PAGE_SHIFT as 13 to
support m68k ports where PAGE_SIZE==8192.
(though this would affect only if static binaries built on
4k page hosts are executed on 8k page hosts)
To solve these inconsistency on PAGE_SIZE definitions,
we should have an independent PAGE_SIZE related definitions
for userland, but it requires major reorganization.
For now (especially for netbsd-9) we define MAX/MIN PAGE_SIZE and
PAGE_SHIFT values in <m68k/vmparam.h> only in !defined(_KERNEL) case.
Discussed on source-changes-d@ and tech-kern@ with christos@ and thorpej@:
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes-d/2020/01/thread1.html#012035
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2020/01/thread1.html#025954
Should be pulled up to netbsd-9.
|
| 1.1.2.1 |
| 01-Feb-2020 |
martin | file vmparam.h was added on branch netbsd-9 on 2020-02-10 18:46:40 +0000
|
