| History log of /src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/gcc_attribute_aligned.c |
| Revision | | Date | Author | Comments |
| 1.8 |
| 01-May-2024 |
rillig | lint: fix size of struct with large alignment
Lint now successfully passes all compile-time assertions in the amd64
kernel that deal with struct sizes.
|
| 1.7 |
| 01-May-2024 |
rillig | lint: support _Alignas and __attribute__((__aligned(4)))
|
| 1.6 |
| 07-Jul-2023 |
rillig | lint: warn about function definitions without header declaration
The existing warning was only issued for function declarations, not for
function definitions.
The interesting change in the tests is in msg_351.c. Many other tests
use non-static functions due to their syntactic brevity. In these
tests, the warning is disabled individually, to allow new functions to
be added without generating warning 351.
|
| 1.5 |
| 27-Aug-2022 |
rillig | tests/lint: add more information to test for __attribute__((aligned))
Declaring an array type having a negative dimension is the simplest way
to embed an integer into a lint diagnostic, thereby revealing what size
and alignment lint has calculated for a struct.
While here, move these "compile-time assertions" closer to their
corresponding struct, to make reading easier.
|
| 1.4 |
| 27-Aug-2022 |
rillig | tests/lint: add another test for aligned struct member
In the kernel, several structs have this attribute, and running lint on
them runs into a compile-time assertion. Typical error messages are:
* error: illegal bit-field size: 255 [36]
* error: integral constant expression expected [55]
|
| 1.3 |
| 17-Jun-2022 |
rillig | tests/lint: make 'expect+-' comments stricter
Previously, the expectations from these comments were already satisfied
if the expectation occurred somewhere in the actual message from lint.
This meant that the prefix 'error:' or 'warning:' could be omitted from
the 'expect' comment. These omissions were hard to see in a manual
review. Now any omissions must be visually marked with '...'.
The test msg_342 now reports its messages properly as being in the file
msg_342.c, rather than msg_341.c. This had been a copy-and-paste
mistake.
|
| 1.2 |
| 15-Jan-2022 |
rillig | tests/lint: expect complete messages in feature tests
Previously, the tests contained many comments like /* expect: 123 */,
which were useless to a casual reader since nobody is expected to learn
lint's message IDs by heart. Replace these with the complete
diagnostics, to show what lint is complaining about.
The tests named msg_*.c have been left unmodified since they mention the
full message text in their header comment.
No functional change.
|
| 1.1 |
| 02-May-2021 |
rillig | tests/lint: demonstrate missing support for __packed __aligned
|
