Cross Reference: /src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg

History log of /src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_123.c
Revision	Date	Author	Comments
1.9	12-Apr-2025	rillig	lint: s/illegal/invalid/g Lint does not provide legal advice.
1.8	03-Jun-2023	rillig	branches: 1.8.2; lint: provide more detailed types when operands do not match
1.7	28-Mar-2023	rillig	lint: warn about extern declarations outside headers https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-userlevel/2023/03/15/msg013727.html
1.6	19-Jun-2022	rillig	lint: add quotes around placeholders in 4 messages
1.5	16-Jun-2022	rillig	tests/lint: make expectation lines in the tests more detailed This commit migrates msg_100 until msg_199.
1.4	04-Dec-2021	rillig	lint: add quotes around placeholders in message 123
1.3	16-Aug-2021	rillig	tests/lint: add tests for several messages about type mismatch
1.2	17-Jan-2021	rillig	lint: add test for ordered comparison between incompatible types
1.1	02-Jan-2021	rillig	lint: add a test for each message produced by lint1 Having a test for each message ensures that upcoming refactorings don't break the basic functionality. Adding the tests will also discover previously unknown bugs in lint. The tests ensure that every lint message can actually be triggered, and they demonstrate how to do so. Having a separate file for each test leaves enough space for documenting historical anecdotes, rationale or edge cases, keeping them away from the source code. The interesting details of this commit are in Makefile and t_integration.sh. All other files are just auto-generated. When running the tests as part of ATF, they are packed together as a single test case. Conceptually, it would have been better to have each test as a separate test case, but ATF quickly becomes very slow as soon as a test program defines too many test cases, and 50 is already too many. The time complexity is O(n^2), not O(n) as one would expect. It's the same problem as in tests/usr.bin/make, which has over 300 test cases as well.
1.8.2.1	02-Aug-2025	perseant	Sync with HEAD

OpenGrok