History log of /src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_171.c |
Revision | | Date | Author | Comments |
1.9 |
| 07-Jul-2023 |
rillig | lint: warn about function definitions without header declaration
The existing warning was only issued for function declarations, not for function definitions.
The interesting change in the tests is in msg_351.c. Many other tests use non-static functions due to their syntactic brevity. In these tests, the warning is disabled individually, to allow new functions to be added without generating warning 351.
|
1.8 |
| 16-Jun-2022 |
rillig | tests/lint: make expectation lines in the tests more detailed
This commit migrates msg_100 until msg_199.
|
1.7 |
| 21-Dec-2021 |
rillig | tests/lint: extend test for nested initializations
|
1.6 |
| 23-Mar-2021 |
rillig | lint: fix wrong error message about type mismatch in compound literal
Now that the code contains explicit markers for starting and ending an initialization, and having the guarantee that an assertion fails whenever some code accesses the state of the "current initialization" even though there is no ongoing initialization gives me much more confidence in the correctness of the code. The calls to begin_initialization and end_initialization always appear in pairs, enclosing the minimal amount of code necessary for initialization.
In a nutshell, global modifiable state is error-prone and hard to understand.
A nice side effect is that the grammar no longer needs a special rule for the outermost initializer since the functions for the debug logging are now called explicitly.
The code that misuses the initialization state just because it needs to temporarily store a sym_t somewhere is now clearly marked as such. A GCC statement expression can appear anywhere and is therefore independent of the initialization. Most probably the code can simply refer to the local variable in the grammar rule itself, or this variable needs to be encoded in the grammar %union. For sure there is a better way to handle this.
There is no longer a need that the function 'declare' initializes the initialization state, it was just the wrong place to do this.
|
1.5 |
| 22-Mar-2021 |
rillig | tests/lint: explain wrong type mismatch in compound literal
When a pointer to a compound literal is used as an initializer, lint reports a wrong type mismatch. The details of what happens are now documented, which allows this problem to be fixed properly.
|
1.4 |
| 22-Mar-2021 |
rillig | lint: use precise type information in message about type mismatch
While here, reword the message, avoiding operators and parentheses.
Since 2021-01-02, providing the precise type name is as easy as the broad type classification (just replace tspec_name with type_name), and it's definitely more useful to the human readers.
|
1.3 |
| 22-Mar-2021 |
rillig | lint: demonstrate bug in assignment of compound literal
Seen in external/mpl/bind/dist/lib/dns/rbtdb.c, update_rrsetstats.
|
1.2 |
| 24-Jan-2021 |
rillig | lint: add tests for a few messages
|
1.1 |
| 02-Jan-2021 |
rillig | lint: add a test for each message produced by lint1
Having a test for each message ensures that upcoming refactorings don't break the basic functionality. Adding the tests will also discover previously unknown bugs in lint.
The tests ensure that every lint message can actually be triggered, and they demonstrate how to do so. Having a separate file for each test leaves enough space for documenting historical anecdotes, rationale or edge cases, keeping them away from the source code.
The interesting details of this commit are in Makefile and t_integration.sh. All other files are just auto-generated.
When running the tests as part of ATF, they are packed together as a single test case. Conceptually, it would have been better to have each test as a separate test case, but ATF quickly becomes very slow as soon as a test program defines too many test cases, and 50 is already too many. The time complexity is O(n^2), not O(n) as one would expect. It's the same problem as in tests/usr.bin/make, which has over 300 test cases as well.
|