OpenGrok
Home
Sort by:
relevance
|
last modified time
|
path
Full Search
in project(s):
src
xsrc
Definition
Symbol
File Path
History
|
|
Help
Searched
refs:Did
(Results
1 - 17
of
17
) sorted by relevancy
/src/sys/rump/
makerumpsyscalls.sh
112
${sawlibrump} || die
Did
not see librump. Wrong directory?
/src/sys/external/bsd/drm2/dist/drm/amd/powerplay/inc/
smu9_driver_if.h
87
uint8_t
Did
; /*
DID
*/
164
uint8_t UlvSmnclkDid; /*
DID
for ULV mode. 0 means CLK will not be modified in ULV. */
165
uint8_t UlvMp1clkDid; /*
DID
for ULV mode. 0 means CLK will not be modified in ULV. */
184
uint8_t SocclkDid [NUM_SOCCLK_DPM_LEVELS]; /*
DID
*/
187
uint8_t VclkDid [NUM_UVD_DPM_LEVELS]; /*
DID
*/
188
uint8_t DclkDid [NUM_UVD_DPM_LEVELS]; /*
DID
*/
191
uint8_t EclkDid [NUM_VCE_DPM_LEVELS]; /*
DID
*/
194
uint8_t Mp0clkDid [NUM_MP0CLK_DPM_LEVELS]; /*
DID
*/
/src/sys/arch/emips/ebus/
flash_ebus.c
1127
uint8_t Mid,
Did
;
1146
sc->sc_ops->read_uint8(sc,sc->sc_page0+(0x0001*2*sc->sc_chips),&
Did
);
1150
sc->sc_type.ft_device_code =
Did
;
1153
if ((sector_maps[i].ft_manuf_code == Mid) && (sector_maps[i].ft_device_code ==
Did
)) {
/src/sys/external/bsd/drm2/dist/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/
amdgpu_vega10_hwmgr.c
1610
current_gfxclk_level->
Did
= (uint8_t)(dividers.ulDid);
1806
current_memclk_level->
Did
= (uint8_t)(dividers.ulDid);
1808
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(current_memclk_level->
Did
>= 1,
3454
"power state
did
not have any performance level",
/src/external/gpl2/rcs/dist/src/
conf.sh
1665
/*
Did
the child fail? (This shouldn't happen.) */
1668
/*
Did
the vfork/compiler bug occur? */
1671
/*
Did
the file descriptor bug occur? */
/src/sys/dev/ic/
mpt_mpilib.h
885
* CONFIG_PAGE_FC_PORT_3 now supports persistent by
DID
.
1752
U32
Did
;
/src/sys/arch/sparc64/sparc64/
locore.s
1922
* We had a data miss but
did
not find a mapping. Insert
2144
tnz %xcc, 1 ! Invalid address??? How
did
this happen?
2356
! rdpr %tl, %g2 ! DEBUG DEBUG --
did
we trap somewhere?
2362
/*
Did
we save a user or kernel window ? */
4064
* kgdb_trap()
did
not handle the trap at all so the stack is
4345
cmp %g7, %g3 !
Did
it work?
5174
mov %g7, %g5 ! We already
did
one restore
7502
cmp %o4, %o5 !
Did
it work?
7609
cmp %o1, %o2 !
Did
we wrap? (tick < tick_cmpr)
7683
cmp %o1, %o2 !
Did
we wrap? (stick < stick_cmpr
[
all
...]
/src/external/bsd/nsd/dist/
configure
106
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as 'sh COMMAND'
9276
/*
Did
the child munge the parent's signal handler? */
9279
/*
Did
the child fail? (This shouldn't happen.) */
9282
/*
Did
the vfork/compiler bug occur? */
9285
/*
Did
the file descriptor bug occur? */
13341
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as 'sh COMMAND'
13815
# If the user
did
not use the arguments to specify the items to instantiate,
/src/external/bsd/ntp/dist/sntp/
configure
106
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as `sh COMMAND'
8621
/*
Did
the child munge the parent's signal handler? */
8624
/*
Did
the child fail? (This shouldn't happen.) */
8627
/*
Did
the vfork/compiler bug occur? */
8630
/*
Did
the file descriptor bug occur? */
24848
# script's behavior
did
not change. They are probably safe to remove.
25953
/*
Did
the child munge the parent's signal handler? */
25956
/*
Did
the child fail? (This shouldn't happen.) */
25959
/*
Did
the vfork/compiler bug occur? */
25962
/*
Did
the file descriptor bug occur? *
[
all
...]
/src/external/bsd/ntp/dist/
configure
106
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as `sh COMMAND'
14767
# script's behavior
did
not change. They are probably safe to remove.
15924
/*
Did
the child munge the parent's signal handler? */
15927
/*
Did
the child fail? (This shouldn't happen.) */
15930
/*
Did
the vfork/compiler bug occur? */
15933
/*
Did
the file descriptor bug occur? */
18020
/*
Did
the child munge the parent's signal handler? */
18023
/*
Did
the child fail? (This shouldn't happen.) */
18026
/*
Did
the vfork/compiler bug occur? */
18029
/*
Did
the file descriptor bug occur? *
[
all
...]
/src/external/bsd/unbound/dist/
configure
106
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as 'sh COMMAND'
17982
/*
Did
the child munge the parent's signal handler? */
17985
/*
Did
the child fail? (This shouldn't happen.) */
17988
/*
Did
the vfork/compiler bug occur? */
17991
/*
Did
the file descriptor bug occur? */
27085
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as 'sh COMMAND'
27867
# If the user
did
not use the arguments to specify the items to instantiate,
/src/external/bsd/file/dist/
configure
106
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as `sh COMMAND'
15022
/*
Did
the child munge the parent's signal handler? */
15025
/*
Did
the child fail? (This shouldn't happen.) */
15028
/*
Did
the vfork/compiler bug occur? */
15031
/*
Did
the file descriptor bug occur? */
16056
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as `sh COMMAND'
16827
# If the user
did
not use the arguments to specify the items to instantiate,
/src/external/gpl2/diffutils/dist/
configure
124
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as `sh COMMAND'
7224
/*
Did
the child fail? (This shouldn't happen.) */
7227
/*
Did
the vfork/compiler bug occur? */
7230
/*
Did
the file descriptor bug occur? */
14222
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as `sh COMMAND'
14540
# If the user
did
not use the arguments to specify the items to instantiate,
/src/external/gpl2/gmake/dist/
configure
122
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as `sh COMMAND'
9345
/*
Did
the child fail? (This shouldn't happen.) */
9348
/*
Did
the vfork/compiler bug occur? */
9351
/*
Did
the file descriptor bug occur? */
14058
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as `sh COMMAND'
14393
# If the user
did
not use the arguments to specify the items to instantiate,
/src/external/gpl2/lvm2/dist/
configure
110
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as `sh COMMAND'
7516
/*
Did
the child fail? (This shouldn't happen.) */
7519
/*
Did
the vfork/compiler bug occur? */
7522
/*
Did
the file descriptor bug occur? */
15750
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as `sh COMMAND'
16169
# If the user
did
not use the arguments to specify the items to instantiate,
/src/external/gpl2/xcvs/dist/
configure
121
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as `sh COMMAND'
13089
/* The version of regex.c in e.g. GNU libc-2.2.93
did
not
15742
/*
Did
the child fail? (This shouldn't happen.) */
15745
/*
Did
the vfork/compiler bug occur? */
15748
/*
Did
the file descriptor bug occur? */
18691
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as `sh COMMAND'
19208
# If the user
did
not use the arguments to specify the items to instantiate,
/src/external/gpl2/gettext/dist/gettext-tools/
configure
84
# We
did
not find ourselves, most probably we were run as `sh COMMAND'
18584
# GCJ
did
not exist at the time GCC didn't implicitly link libc in.
31111
/*
Did
the child fail? (This shouldn't happen.) */
31114
/*
Did
the vfork/compiler bug occur? */
31117
/*
Did
the file descriptor bug occur? */
[
all
...]
Completed in 137 milliseconds
Indexes created Wed Apr 15 00:22:22 UTC 2026