NetBSD Cross-Reference & Source Code Search Engine

Home	Sort by: relevance \| last modified time \| path

Full Search

in project(s):

Definition

Symbol

File Path

History

| | Help

Searched defs:fec (Results 1 - 3 of 3) sorted by relevancy

/src/usr.sbin/ldpd/
tlv_stack.c	69 debugp("Invalid FEC TLV !\n"); 92 * Note that this version of LDP supports the use of multiple FEC 93 * Elements per FEC for the Label Mapping message only. The use of 94 * multiple FEC Elements in other messages is not permitted in this 146 fatalp("Unknown FEC type %d\n", pref->type); 163 debugp("Invalid FEC TLV !\n"); 216 fatalp("Unknown FEC type %d\n", pref->type); 245 struct fec_tlv fec; local 253 Ok, so we have label map tlv that contains fec tlvs and label tlv 254 * but fec tlv contains prefix or host tlvs and prefix or host tlv 349 struct fec_tlv *fec; local [all...]
tlv_stack.c	69 debugp("Invalid FEC TLV !\n"); 92 * Note that this version of LDP supports the use of multiple FEC 93 * Elements per FEC for the Label Mapping message only. The use of 94 * multiple FEC Elements in other messages is not permitted in this 146 fatalp("Unknown FEC type %d\n", pref->type); 163 debugp("Invalid FEC TLV !\n"); 216 fatalp("Unknown FEC type %d\n", pref->type); 245 struct fec_tlv fec; local 253 Ok, so we have label map tlv that contains fec tlvs and label tlv 254 * but fec tlv contains prefix or host tlvs and prefix or host tlv 349 struct fec_tlv *fec; local [all...]
tlv_stack.c	69 debugp("Invalid FEC TLV !\n"); 92 * Note that this version of LDP supports the use of multiple FEC 93 * Elements per FEC for the Label Mapping message only. The use of 94 * multiple FEC Elements in other messages is not permitted in this 146 fatalp("Unknown FEC type %d\n", pref->type); 163 debugp("Invalid FEC TLV !\n"); 216 fatalp("Unknown FEC type %d\n", pref->type); 245 struct fec_tlv fec; local 253 Ok, so we have label map tlv that contains fec tlvs and label tlv 254 * but fec tlv contains prefix or host tlvs and prefix or host tlv 349 struct fec_tlv *fec; local [all...]

Completed in 40 milliseconds