Home | History | Annotate | Line # | Download | only in html
QSHAPE_README.html revision 1.1.1.1.4.2
      1  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
      2  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt         "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
      3  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
      4  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <html>
      5  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
      6  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <head>
      7  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
      8  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <title>Postfix Bottleneck Analysis</title>
      9  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     10  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
     11  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     12  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </head>
     13  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     14  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <body>
     15  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     16  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <h1><img src="postfix-logo.jpg" width="203" height="98" ALT="">Postfix Bottleneck Analysis</h1>
     17  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     18  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <hr>
     19  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     20  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <h2>Purpose of this document </h2>
     21  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     22  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> This document is an introduction to Postfix queue congestion analysis.
     23  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt It explains how the <a href="qshape.1.html">qshape(1)</a> program can help to track down the
     24  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt reason for queue congestion.  <a href="qshape.1.html">qshape(1)</a> is bundled with Postfix
     25  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 2.1 and later source code, under the "auxiliary" directory. This
     26  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt document describes <a href="qshape.1.html">qshape(1)</a> as bundled with Postfix 2.4.  </p>
     27  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     28  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> This document covers the following topics: </p>
     29  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     30  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <ul>
     31  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     32  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li><a href="#qshape">Introducing the qshape tool</a>
     33  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     34  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li><a href="#trouble_shooting">Trouble shooting with qshape</a> 
     35  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     36  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li><a href="#healthy">Example 1: Healthy queue</a>
     37  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     38  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li><a href="#dictionary_bounce">Example 2: Deferred queue full of
     39  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt dictionary attack bounces</a></li>
     40  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     41  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li><a href="#active_congestion">Example 3: Congestion in the active
     42  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queue</a></li>
     43  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     44  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li><a href="#backlog">Example 4: High volume destination backlog</a>
     45  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     46  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li><a href="#queues">Postfix queue directories</a>
     47  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     48  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <ul>
     49  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     50  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <a href="#maildrop_queue"> The "maildrop" queue </a>
     51  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     52  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <a href="#hold_queue"> The "hold" queue </a>
     53  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     54  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <a href="#incoming_queue"> The "incoming" queue </a>
     55  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     56  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <a href="#active_queue"> The "active" queue </a>
     57  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     58  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <a href="#deferred_queue"> The "deferred" queue </a>
     59  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     60  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </ul>
     61  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     62  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li><a href="#credits">Credits</a>
     63  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     64  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </ul>
     65  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     66  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <h2><a name="qshape">Introducing the qshape tool</a></h2>
     67  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     68  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> When mail is draining slowly or the queue is unexpectedly large,
     69  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt run <a href="qshape.1.html">qshape(1)</a> as the super-user (root) to help zero in on the problem.
     70  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt The <a href="qshape.1.html">qshape(1)</a> program displays a tabular view of the Postfix queue
     71  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt contents.  </p>
     72  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     73  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <ul>
     74  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     75  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> On the horizontal axis, it displays the queue age with
     76  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt fine granularity for recent messages and (geometrically) less fine
     77  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt granularity for older messages.  </p>
     78  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     79  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> The vertical axis displays the destination (or with the
     80  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt "-s" switch the sender) domain. Domains with the most messages are
     81  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt listed first. </p>
     82  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     83  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </ul>
     84  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     85  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> For example, in the output below we see the top 10 lines of
     86  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the (mostly forged) sender domain distribution for captured spam
     87  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt in the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#hold_queue">hold" queue</a>: </p>
     88  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
     89  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <blockquote>
     90  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
     91  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $ qshape -s hold | head
     92  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt                          T  5 10 20 40 80 160 320 640 1280 1280+
     93  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt                  TOTAL 486  0  0  1  0  0   2   4  20   40   419
     94  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt              yahoo.com  14  0  0  1  0  0   0   0   1    0    12
     95  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt   extremepricecuts.net  13  0  0  0  0  0   0   0   2    0    11
     96  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt         ms35.hinet.net  12  0  0  0  0  0   0   0   0    1    11
     97  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt       winnersdaily.net  12  0  0  0  0  0   0   0   2    0    10
     98  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt            hotmail.com  11  0  0  0  0  0   0   0   0    1    10
     99  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt            worldnet.fr   6  0  0  0  0  0   0   0   0    0     6
    100  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt         ms41.hinet.net   6  0  0  0  0  0   0   0   0    0     6
    101  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt                 osn.de   5  0  0  0  0  0   1   0   0    0     4
    102  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    103  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </blockquote>
    104  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    105  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <ul>
    106  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    107  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> The "T" column shows the total (in this case sender) count
    108  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt for each domain.  The columns with numbers above them, show counts
    109  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt for messages aged fewer than that many minutes, but not younger
    110  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt than the age limit for the previous column.  The row labeled "TOTAL"
    111  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt shows the total count for all domains. </p>
    112  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    113  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> In this example, there are 14 messages allegedly from
    114  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt yahoo.com, 1 between 10 and 20 minutes old, 1 between 320 and 640
    115  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt minutes old and 12 older than 1280 minutes (1440 minutes in a day).
    116  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </p>
    117  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    118  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </ul>
    119  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    120  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> When the output is a terminal intermediate results showing the top 20
    121  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt domains (-n option) are displayed after every 1000 messages (-N option)
    122  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt and the final output also shows only the top 20 domains. This makes
    123  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt qshape useful even when the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a> is very large and it may
    124  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt otherwise take prohibitively long to read the entire <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a>. </p>
    125  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    126  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> By default, qshape shows statistics for the union of both the
    127  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming</a> and <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queues</a> which are the most relevant queues to
    128  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt look at when analyzing performance. </p>
    129  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    130  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> One can request an alternate list of queues: </p>
    131  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    132  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <blockquote>
    133  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
    134  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $ qshape deferred
    135  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $ qshape incoming active deferred
    136  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    137  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </blockquote>
    138  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    139  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> this will show the age distribution of the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a> or
    140  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the union of the incoming active and <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queues</a>. </p>
    141  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    142  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Command line options control the number of display "buckets",
    143  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the age limit for the smallest bucket, display of parent domain
    144  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt counts and so on. The "-h" option outputs a summary of the available
    145  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt switches. </p>
    146  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    147  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <h2><a name="trouble_shooting">Trouble shooting with qshape</a>
    148  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </h2>
    149  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    150  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Large numbers in the qshape output represent a large number of
    151  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt messages that are destined to (or alleged to come from) a particular
    152  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt domain.  It should be possible to tell at a glance which domains
    153  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt dominate the queue sender or recipient counts, approximately when
    154  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt a burst of mail started, and when it stopped. </p>
    155  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    156  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The problem destinations or sender domains appear near the top
    157  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt left corner of the output table. Remember that the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a>
    158  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt can accommodate up to 20000 ($<a href="postconf.5.html#qmgr_message_active_limit">qmgr_message_active_limit</a>) messages.
    159  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt To check whether this limit has been reached, use: </p>
    160  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    161  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <blockquote>
    162  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
    163  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $ qshape -s active       <i>(show sender statistics)</i>
    164  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    165  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </blockquote>
    166  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    167  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> If the total sender count is below 20000 the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> is
    168  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt not yet saturated, any high volume sender domains show near the
    169  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt top of the output.
    170  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    171  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> With <a href="qmgr.8.html">oqmgr(8)</a> the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> is also limited to at most 20000
    172  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt recipient addresses ($<a href="postconf.5.html#qmgr_message_recipient_limit">qmgr_message_recipient_limit</a>). To check for
    173  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt exhaustion of this limit use: </p>
    174  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    175  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <blockquote>
    176  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
    177  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $ qshape active          <i>(show recipient statistics)</i>
    178  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    179  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </blockquote>
    180  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    181  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Having found the high volume domains, it is often useful to
    182  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt search the logs for recent messages pertaining to the domains in
    183  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt question. </p>
    184  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    185  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <blockquote>
    186  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
    187  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt # Find deliveries to example.com
    188  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt #
    189  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $ tail -10000 /var/log/maillog |
    190  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt         egrep -i ': to=&lt;.*@example\.com&gt;,' |
    191  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt         less
    192  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    193  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt # Find messages from example.com
    194  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt #
    195  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $ tail -10000 /var/log/maillog |
    196  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt         egrep -i ': from=&lt;.*@example\.com&gt;,' |
    197  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt         less
    198  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    199  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </blockquote>
    200  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    201  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> You may want to drill in on some specific queue ids: </p>
    202  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    203  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <blockquote>
    204  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
    205  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt # Find all messages for a specific queue id.
    206  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt #
    207  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $ tail -10000 /var/log/maillog | egrep ': 2B2173FF68: '
    208  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    209  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </blockquote>
    210  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    211  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Also look for queue manager warning messages in the log. These
    212  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt warnings can suggest strategies to reduce congestion. </p>
    213  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    214  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <blockquote>
    215  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
    216  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $ egrep 'qmgr.*(panic|fatal|error|warning):' /var/log/maillog
    217  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    218  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </blockquote>
    219  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    220  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> When all else fails try the Postfix mailing list for help, but
    221  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt please don't forget to include the top 10 or 20 lines of <a href="qshape.1.html">qshape(1)</a>
    222  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt output.  </p>
    223  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    224  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <h2><a name="healthy">Example 1: Healthy queue</a></h2>
    225  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    226  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> When looking at just the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming</a> and <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queues</a>, under
    227  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt normal conditions (no congestion) the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming</a> and <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queues</a>
    228  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt are nearly empty. Mail leaves the system almost as quickly as it
    229  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt comes in or is deferred without congestion in the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a>.
    230  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </p>
    231  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    232  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <blockquote>
    233  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
    234  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $ qshape        <i>(show <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming</a> and <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> status)</i>
    235  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    236  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt                  T  5 10 20 40 80 160 320 640 1280 1280+
    237  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt           TOTAL  5  0  0  0  1  0   0   0   1    1     2
    238  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt   meri.uwasa.fi  5  0  0  0  1  0   0   0   1    1     2
    239  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    240  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </blockquote>
    241  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    242  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> If one looks at the two queues separately, the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming queue</a>
    243  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt is empty or perhaps briefly has one or two messages, while the
    244  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> holds more messages and for a somewhat longer time:
    245  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </p>
    246  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    247  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <blockquote>
    248  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
    249  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $ qshape incoming
    250  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    251  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt                  T  5 10 20 40 80 160 320 640 1280 1280+
    252  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt           TOTAL  0  0  0  0  0  0   0   0   0    0     0
    253  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    254  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $ qshape active
    255  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    256  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt                  T  5 10 20 40 80 160 320 640 1280 1280+
    257  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt           TOTAL  5  0  0  0  1  0   0   0   1    1     2
    258  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt   meri.uwasa.fi  5  0  0  0  1  0   0   0   1    1     2
    259  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    260  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </blockquote>
    261  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    262  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <h2><a name="dictionary_bounce">Example 2: Deferred queue full of
    263  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt dictionary attack bounces</a></h2>
    264  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    265  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> This is from a server where recipient validation is not yet
    266  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt available for some of the <a href="VIRTUAL_README.html#canonical">hosted domains</a>. Dictionary attacks on
    267  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the unvalidated domains result in bounce backscatter. The bounces
    268  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt dominate the queue, but with proper tuning they do not saturate the
    269  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming</a> or <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queues</a>. The high volume of deferred mail is not
    270  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt a direct cause for alarm. </p>
    271  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    272  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <blockquote>
    273  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
    274  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $ qshape deferred | head
    275  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    276  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt                          T  5 10 20 40 80 160 320 640 1280 1280+
    277  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt                 TOTAL 2234  4  2  5  9 31  57 108 201  464  1353
    278  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt   heyhihellothere.com  207  0  0  1  1  6   6   8  25   68    92
    279  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt   pleazerzoneprod.com  105  0  0  0  0  0   0   0   5   44    56
    280  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt        groups.msn.com   63  2  1  2  4  4  14  14  14    8     0
    281  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     orion.toppoint.de   49  0  0  0  1  0   2   4   3   16    23
    282  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt           kali.com.cn   46  0  0  0  0  1   0   2   6   12    25
    283  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt         meri.uwasa.fi   44  0  0  0  0  1   0   2   8   11    22
    284  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     gjr.paknet.com.pk   43  1  0  0  1  1   3   3   6   12    16
    285  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt  aristotle.algonet.se   41  0  0  0  0  0   1   2  11   12    15
    286  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    287  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </blockquote>
    288  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    289  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The domains shown are mostly bulk-mailers and all the volume
    290  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt is the tail end of the time distribution, showing that short term
    291  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt arrival rates are moderate. Larger numbers and lower message ages
    292  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt are more indicative of current trouble. Old mail still going nowhere
    293  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt is largely harmless so long as the active and <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming queues</a> are
    294  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt short. We can also see that the groups.msn.com undeliverables are
    295  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt low rate steady stream rather than a concentrated dictionary attack
    296  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt that is now over. </p>
    297  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    298  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <blockquote>
    299  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
    300  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $ qshape -s deferred | head
    301  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    302  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt                      T  5 10 20 40 80 160 320 640 1280 1280+
    303  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt             TOTAL 2193  4  4  5  8 33  56 104 205  465  1309
    304  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     MAILER-DAEMON 1709  4  4  5  8 33  55 101 198  452   849
    305  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt       example.com  263  0  0  0  0  0   0   0   0    2   261
    306  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt       example.org  209  0  0  0  0  0   1   3   6   11   188
    307  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt       example.net    6  0  0  0  0  0   0   0   0    0     6
    308  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt       example.edu    3  0  0  0  0  0   0   0   0    0     3
    309  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt       example.gov    2  0  0  0  0  0   0   0   1    0     1
    310  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt       example.mil    1  0  0  0  0  0   0   0   0    0     1
    311  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    312  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </blockquote>
    313  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    314  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Looking at the sender distribution, we see that as expected
    315  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt most of the messages are bounces. </p>
    316  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    317  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <h2><a name="active_congestion">Example 3: Congestion in the active
    318  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queue</a></h2>
    319  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    320  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> This example is taken from a Feb 2004 discussion on the Postfix
    321  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt Users list.  Congestion was reported with the active and incoming
    322  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queues large and not shrinking despite very large delivery agent
    323  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt process limits.  The thread is archived at:
    324  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="http://groups.google.com/groups?th=636626c645f5bbde">http://groups.google.com/groups?th=636626c645f5bbde</a> </p>
    325  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    326  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Using an older version of <a href="qshape.1.html">qshape(1)</a> it was quickly determined
    327  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt that all the messages were for just a few destinations: </p>
    328  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    329  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <blockquote>
    330  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
    331  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $ qshape        <i>(show <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming</a> and <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> status)</i>
    332  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    333  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt                            T   A   5  10  20  40  80 160 320 320+
    334  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt                  TOTAL 11775 9996  0   0   1   1  42  94 221 1420
    335  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt   user.sourceforge.net  7678 7678  0   0   0   0   0   0   0    0
    336  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt  lists.sourceforge.net  2313 2313  0   0   0   0   0   0   0    0
    337  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt         gzd.gotdns.com   102    0  0   0   0   0   0   0   2  100
    338  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    339  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </blockquote>
    340  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    341  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The "A" column showed the count of messages in the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a>,
    342  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt and the numbered columns showed totals for the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a>. At
    343  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 10000 messages (Postfix 1.x <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> size limit) the active
    344  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queue is full. The incoming was growing rapidly. </p>
    345  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    346  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> With the trouble destinations clearly identified, the administrator
    347  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt quickly found and fixed the problem. It is substantially harder to
    348  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt glean the same information from the logs. While a careful reading
    349  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt of <a href="mailq.1.html">mailq(1)</a> output should yield similar results, it is much harder
    350  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt to gauge the magnitude of the problem by looking at the queue
    351  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt one message at a time. </p>
    352  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    353  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <h2><a name="backlog">Example 4: High volume destination backlog</a></h2>
    354  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    355  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> When a site you send a lot of email to is down or slow, mail
    356  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt messages will rapidly build up in the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a>, or worse, in
    357  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a>. The qshape output will show large numbers for
    358  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the destination domain in all age buckets that overlap the starting
    359  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt time of the problem: </p>
    360  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    361  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <blockquote>
    362  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
    363  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $ qshape deferred | head
    364  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    365  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt                     T   5  10  20  40   80  160 320 640 1280 1280+
    366  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt            TOTAL 5000 200 200 400 800 1600 1000 200 200  200   200
    367  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt   highvolume.com 4000 160 160 320 640 1280 1440   0   0    0     0
    368  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt              ...
    369  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    370  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </blockquote>
    371  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    372  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Here the "highvolume.com" destination is continuing to accumulate
    373  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt deferred mail. The <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming</a> and <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queues</a> are fine, but the
    374  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a> started growing some time between 1 and 2 hours ago
    375  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt and continues to grow. </p>
    376  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    377  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> If the high volume destination is not down, but is instead
    378  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt slow, one might see similar congestion in the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a>. Active
    379  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queue congestion is a greater cause for alarm; one might need to
    380  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt take measures to ensure that the mail is deferred instead or even
    381  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt add an <a href="access.5.html">access(5)</a> rule asking the sender to try again later. </p>
    382  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    383  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> If a high volume destination exhibits frequent bursts of consecutive
    384  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt connections refused by all MX hosts or "421 Server busy errors", it
    385  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt is possible for the queue manager to mark the destination as "dead"
    386  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt despite the transient nature of the errors. The destination will be
    387  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt retried again after the expiration of a $<a href="postconf.5.html#minimal_backoff_time">minimal_backoff_time</a> timer.
    388  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt If the error bursts are frequent enough it may be that only a small
    389  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt quantity of email is delivered before the destination is again marked
    390  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt "dead". In some cases enabling static (not on demand) connection
    391  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt caching by listing the appropriate nexthop domain in a table included in
    392  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt "<a href="postconf.5.html#smtp_connection_cache_destinations">smtp_connection_cache_destinations</a>" may help to reduce the error rate,
    393  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt because most messages will re-use existing connections. </p>
    394  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    395  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The MTA that has been observed most frequently to exhibit such
    396  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt bursts of errors is Microsoft Exchange, which refuses connections
    397  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt under load. Some proxy virus scanners in front of the Exchange
    398  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt server propagate the refused connection to the client as a "421"
    399  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt error. </p>
    400  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    401  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Note that it is now possible to configure Postfix to exhibit similarly
    402  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt erratic behavior by misconfiguring the <a href="anvil.8.html">anvil(8)</a> service.  Do not use
    403  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="anvil.8.html">anvil(8)</a> for steady-state rate limiting, its purpose is (unintentional)
    404  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt DoS prevention and the rate limits set should be very generous! </p>
    405  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    406  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> If one finds oneself needing to deliver a high volume of mail to a
    407  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt destination that exhibits frequent brief bursts of errors and connection
    408  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt caching does not solve the problem, there is a subtle workaround. </p>
    409  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    410  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <ul>
    411  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    412  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> Postfix version 2.5 and later: </p>
    413  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    414  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <ul>
    415  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    416  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> In <a href="master.5.html">master.cf</a> set up a dedicated clone of the "smtp" transport
    417  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt for the destination in question. In the example below we will call
    418  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt it "fragile". </p>
    419  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    420  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> In <a href="master.5.html">master.cf</a> configure a reasonable process limit for the
    421  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt cloned smtp transport (a number in the 10-20 range is typical). </p>
    422  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    423  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> IMPORTANT!!! In <a href="postconf.5.html">main.cf</a> configure a large per-destination
    424  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt pseudo-cohort failure limit for the cloned smtp transport. </p>
    425  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    426  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
    427  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt /etc/postfix/<a href="postconf.5.html">main.cf</a>:
    428  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     <a href="postconf.5.html#transport_maps">transport_maps</a> = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
    429  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     fragile_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit = 100
    430  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     fragile_destination_concurrency_limit = 20
    431  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    432  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt /etc/postfix/transport:
    433  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     example.com  fragile:
    434  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    435  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt /etc/postfix/<a href="master.5.html">master.cf</a>:
    436  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     # service type  private unpriv  chroot  wakeup  maxproc command
    437  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     fragile   unix     -       -       n       -      20    smtp
    438  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    439  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    440  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> See also the documentation for
    441  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="postconf.5.html#default_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit">default_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit</a> and
    442  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="postconf.5.html#default_destination_concurrency_limit">default_destination_concurrency_limit</a>. </p>
    443  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    444  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </ul>
    445  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    446  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> Earlier Postfix versions: </p>
    447  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    448  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <ul>
    449  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    450  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> In <a href="master.5.html">master.cf</a> set up a dedicated clone of the "smtp"
    451  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt transport for the destination in question. In the example below
    452  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt we will call it "fragile". </p>
    453  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    454  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> In <a href="master.5.html">master.cf</a> configure a reasonable process limit for the
    455  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt transport (a number in the 10-20 range is typical). </p>
    456  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    457  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> IMPORTANT!!! In <a href="postconf.5.html">main.cf</a> configure a very large initial
    458  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt and destination concurrency limit for this transport (say 2000). </p>
    459  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    460  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
    461  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt /etc/postfix/<a href="postconf.5.html">main.cf</a>:
    462  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     <a href="postconf.5.html#transport_maps">transport_maps</a> = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
    463  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     <a href="postconf.5.html#initial_destination_concurrency">initial_destination_concurrency</a> = 2000
    464  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     fragile_destination_concurrency_limit = 2000
    465  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    466  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt /etc/postfix/transport:
    467  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     example.com  fragile:
    468  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    469  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt /etc/postfix/<a href="master.5.html">master.cf</a>:
    470  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     # service type  private unpriv  chroot  wakeup  maxproc command
    471  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     fragile   unix     -       -       n       -      20    smtp
    472  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    473  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    474  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> See also the documentation for <a href="postconf.5.html#default_destination_concurrency_limit">default_destination_concurrency_limit</a>.
    475  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </p>
    476  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    477  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </ul>
    478  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    479  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </ul>
    480  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    481  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The effect of this configuration is that up to 2000
    482  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt consecutive errors are tolerated without marking the destination
    483  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt dead, while the total concurrency remains reasonable (10-20
    484  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt processes). This trick is only for a very specialized situation:
    485  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt high volume delivery into a channel with multi-error bursts
    486  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt that is capable of high throughput, but is repeatedly throttled by
    487  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the bursts of errors. </p>
    488  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    489  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> When a destination is unable to handle the load even after the
    490  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt Postfix process limit is reduced to 1, a desperate measure is to
    491  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt insert brief delays between delivery attempts. </p>
    492  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    493  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <ul> 
    494  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    495  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> Postfix version 2.5 and later: </p>
    496  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    497  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <ul>
    498  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    499  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> In <a href="master.5.html">master.cf</a> set up a dedicated clone of the "smtp" transport
    500  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt for the problem destination. In the example below we call it "slow".
    501  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </p>
    502  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    503  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> In <a href="postconf.5.html">main.cf</a> configure a short delay between deliveries to
    504  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the same destination.  </p>
    505  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    506  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
    507  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt /etc/postfix/<a href="postconf.5.html">main.cf</a>:
    508  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     <a href="postconf.5.html#transport_maps">transport_maps</a> = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
    509  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     slow_destination_rate_delay = 1
    510  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    511  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt /etc/postfix/transport:
    512  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     example.com  slow:
    513  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    514  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt /etc/postfix/<a href="master.5.html">master.cf</a>:
    515  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     # service type  private unpriv  chroot  wakeup  maxproc command
    516  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     slow      unix     -       -       n       -       -    smtp
    517  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    518  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    519  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </ul>
    520  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    521  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> See also the documentation for <a href="postconf.5.html#default_destination_rate_delay">default_destination_rate_delay</a>. </p>
    522  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    523  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> This solution forces the Postfix <a href="smtp.8.html">smtp(8)</a> client to wait for
    524  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $slow_destination_rate_delay seconds between deliveries to the same
    525  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt destination.  </p>
    526  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    527  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> Earlier Postfix versions: </p>
    528  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    529  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <ul>
    530  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    531  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p>  In the transport map entry for the problem destination,
    532  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt specify a dead host as the primary nexthop. </p>
    533  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    534  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <li> <p> In the <a href="master.5.html">master.cf</a> entry for the transport specify the
    535  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt problem destination as the <a href="postconf.5.html#fallback_relay">fallback_relay</a> and specify a small
    536  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="postconf.5.html#smtp_connect_timeout">smtp_connect_timeout</a> value. </p>
    537  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    538  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <pre>
    539  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt /etc/postfix/<a href="postconf.5.html">main.cf</a>:
    540  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     <a href="postconf.5.html#transport_maps">transport_maps</a> = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
    541  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    542  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt /etc/postfix/transport:
    543  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     example.com  slow:[dead.host]
    544  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    545  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt /etc/postfix/<a href="master.5.html">master.cf</a>:
    546  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     # service type  private unpriv  chroot  wakeup  maxproc command
    547  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt     slow      unix     -       -       n       -       1    smtp
    548  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt         -o <a href="postconf.5.html#fallback_relay">fallback_relay</a>=problem.example.com
    549  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt         -o <a href="postconf.5.html#smtp_connect_timeout">smtp_connect_timeout</a>=1
    550  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt         -o <a href="postconf.5.html#smtp_connection_cache_on_demand">smtp_connection_cache_on_demand</a>=no
    551  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </pre>
    552  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    553  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </ul>
    554  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    555  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> This solution forces the Postfix <a href="smtp.8.html">smtp(8)</a> client to wait for
    556  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $<a href="postconf.5.html#smtp_connect_timeout">smtp_connect_timeout</a> seconds between deliveries. The connection
    557  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt caching feature is disabled to prevent the client from skipping
    558  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt over the dead host.  </p>
    559  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    560  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </ul>
    561  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    562  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <h2><a name="queues">Postfix queue directories</a></h2>
    563  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    564  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The following sections describe Postfix queues: their purpose,
    565  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt what normal behavior looks like, and how to diagnose abnormal
    566  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt behavior. </p>
    567  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    568  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <h3> <a name="maildrop_queue"> The "maildrop" queue </a> </h3>
    569  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    570  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Messages that have been submitted via the Postfix <a href="sendmail.1.html">sendmail(1)</a>
    571  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt command, but not yet brought into the main Postfix queue by the
    572  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="pickup.8.html">pickup(8)</a> service, await processing in the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#maildrop_queue">maildrop" queue</a>. Messages
    573  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt can be added to the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#maildrop_queue">maildrop" queue</a> even when the Postfix system
    574  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt is not running. They will begin to be processed once Postfix is
    575  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt started.  </p>
    576  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    577  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#maildrop_queue">maildrop" queue</a> is drained by the single threaded <a href="pickup.8.html">pickup(8)</a>
    578  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt service scanning the queue directory periodically or when notified
    579  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt of new message arrival by the <a href="postdrop.1.html">postdrop(1)</a> program. The <a href="postdrop.1.html">postdrop(1)</a>
    580  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt program is a setgid helper that allows the unprivileged Postfix
    581  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="sendmail.1.html">sendmail(1)</a> program to inject mail into the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#maildrop_queue">maildrop" queue</a> and
    582  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt to notify the <a href="pickup.8.html">pickup(8)</a> service of its arrival. </p>
    583  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    584  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> All mail that enters the main Postfix queue does so via the
    585  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="cleanup.8.html">cleanup(8)</a> service. The cleanup service is responsible for envelope
    586  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt and header rewriting, header and body regular expression checks,
    587  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt automatic bcc recipient processing, milter content processing, and
    588  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt reliable insertion of the message into the Postfix "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming" queue</a>. </p>
    589  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    590  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> In the absence of excessive CPU consumption in <a href="cleanup.8.html">cleanup(8)</a> header
    591  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt or body regular expression checks or other software consuming all
    592  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt available CPU resources, Postfix performance is disk I/O bound.
    593  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt The rate at which the <a href="pickup.8.html">pickup(8)</a> service can inject messages into
    594  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the queue is largely determined by disk access times, since the
    595  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="cleanup.8.html">cleanup(8)</a> service must commit the message to stable storage before
    596  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt returning success. The same is true of the <a href="postdrop.1.html">postdrop(1)</a> program
    597  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt writing the message to the "maildrop" directory. </p>
    598  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    599  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> As the pickup service is single threaded, it can only deliver
    600  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt one message at a time at a rate that does not exceed the reciprocal
    601  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt disk I/O latency (+ CPU if not negligible) of the cleanup service.
    602  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </p>
    603  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    604  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Congestion in this queue is indicative of an excessive local message
    605  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt submission rate or perhaps excessive CPU consumption in the <a href="cleanup.8.html">cleanup(8)</a>
    606  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt service due to excessive <a href="postconf.5.html#body_checks">body_checks</a>, or (Postfix &ge; 2.3) high latency
    607  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt milters. </p>
    608  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    609  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Note, that once the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> is full, the cleanup service
    610  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt will attempt to slow down message injection by pausing $<a href="postconf.5.html#in_flow_delay">in_flow_delay</a>
    611  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt for each message. In this case "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#maildrop_queue">maildrop" queue</a> congestion may be
    612  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt a consequence of congestion downstream, rather than a problem in
    613  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt its own right. </p>
    614  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    615  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Note, you should not attempt to deliver large volumes of mail via
    616  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the <a href="pickup.8.html">pickup(8)</a> service. High volume sites should avoid using "simple"
    617  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt content filters that re-inject scanned mail via Postfix <a href="sendmail.1.html">sendmail(1)</a>
    618  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt and <a href="postdrop.1.html">postdrop(1)</a>. </p>
    619  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    620  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> A high arrival rate of locally submitted mail may be an indication
    621  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt of an uncaught forwarding loop, or a run-away notification program.
    622  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt Try to keep the volume of local mail injection to a moderate level.
    623  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </p>
    624  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    625  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The "postsuper -r" command can place selected messages into
    626  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#maildrop_queue">maildrop" queue</a> for reprocessing. This is most useful for
    627  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt resetting any stale <a href="postconf.5.html#content_filter">content_filter</a> settings. Requeuing a large number
    628  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt of messages using "postsuper -r" can clearly cause a spike in the
    629  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt size of the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#maildrop_queue">maildrop" queue</a>. </p>
    630  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    631  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <h3> <a name="hold_queue"> The "hold" queue </a> </h3>
    632  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    633  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The administrator can define "smtpd" <a href="access.5.html">access(5)</a> policies, or
    634  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="cleanup.8.html">cleanup(8)</a> header/body checks that cause messages to be automatically
    635  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt diverted from normal processing and placed indefinitely in the
    636  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#hold_queue">hold" queue</a>. Messages placed in the "hold" queue stay there until
    637  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the administrator intervenes. No periodic delivery attempts are
    638  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt made for messages in the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#hold_queue">hold" queue</a>. The <a href="postsuper.1.html">postsuper(1)</a> command
    639  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt can be used to manually release messages into the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred" queue</a>.
    640  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </p>
    641  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    642  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Messages can potentially stay in the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#hold_queue">hold" queue</a> longer than
    643  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt $<a href="postconf.5.html#maximal_queue_lifetime">maximal_queue_lifetime</a>. If such "old" messages need to be released from
    644  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#hold_queue">hold" queue</a>, they should typically be moved into the "maildrop"
    645  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queue using "postsuper -r", so that the message gets a new timestamp and
    646  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt is given more than one opportunity to be delivered.  Messages that are
    647  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt "young" can be moved directly into the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred" queue</a> using
    648  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt "postsuper -H". </p>
    649  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    650  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#hold_queue">hold" queue</a> plays little role in Postfix performance, and
    651  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt monitoring of the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#hold_queue">hold" queue</a> is typically more closely motivated
    652  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt by tracking spam and malware, than by performance issues. </p>
    653  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    654  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <h3> <a name="incoming_queue"> The "incoming" queue </a> </h3>
    655  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    656  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> All new mail entering the Postfix queue is written by the
    657  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="cleanup.8.html">cleanup(8)</a> service into the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming" queue</a>. New queue files are
    658  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt created owned by the "postfix" user with an access bitmask (or
    659  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt mode) of 0600. Once a queue file is ready for further processing
    660  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the <a href="cleanup.8.html">cleanup(8)</a> service changes the queue file mode to 0700 and
    661  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt notifies the queue manager of new mail arrival. The queue manager
    662  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt ignores incomplete queue files whose mode is 0600, as these are
    663  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt still being written by cleanup.  </p>
    664  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    665  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The queue manager scans the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming queue</a> bringing any new
    666  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt mail into the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active" queue</a> if the active queue resource limits
    667  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt have not been exceeded. By default, the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> accommodates
    668  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt at most 20000 messages. Once the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> message limit is
    669  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt reached, the queue manager stops scanning the incoming (and deferred,
    670  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt see below) queue.  </p>
    671  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    672  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Under normal conditions the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming queue</a> is nearly empty (has
    673  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt only mode 0600 files), with the queue manager able to import new
    674  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt messages into the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> as soon as they become available.
    675  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </p>
    676  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    677  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming queue</a> grows when the message input rate spikes
    678  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt above the rate at which the queue manager can import messages into
    679  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a>. The main factors slowing down the queue manager
    680  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt are disk I/O and lookup queries to the trivial-rewrite service. If the queue
    681  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt manager is routinely not keeping up, consider not using "slow"
    682  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt lookup services (MySQL, LDAP, ...) for transport lookups or speeding
    683  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt up the hosts that provide the lookup service.  If the problem is I/O
    684  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt starvation, consider striping the queue over more disks, faster controllers
    685  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt with a battery write cache, or other hardware improvements. At the very
    686  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt least, make sure that the queue directory is mounted with the "noatime"
    687  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt option if applicable to the underlying filesystem. </p>
    688  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    689  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The <a href="postconf.5.html#in_flow_delay">in_flow_delay</a> parameter is used to clamp the input rate
    690  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt when the queue manager starts to fall behind. The <a href="cleanup.8.html">cleanup(8)</a> service
    691  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt will pause for $<a href="postconf.5.html#in_flow_delay">in_flow_delay</a> seconds before creating a new queue
    692  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt file if it cannot obtain a "token" from the queue manager.  </p>
    693  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    694  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Since the number of <a href="cleanup.8.html">cleanup(8)</a> processes is limited in most
    695  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt cases by the SMTP server concurrency, the input rate can exceed
    696  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the output rate by at most "SMTP connection count" / $<a href="postconf.5.html#in_flow_delay">in_flow_delay</a>
    697  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt messages per second.  </p>
    698  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    699  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> With a default process limit of 100, and an <a href="postconf.5.html#in_flow_delay">in_flow_delay</a> of
    700  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 1s, the coupling is strong enough to limit a single run-away injector
    701  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt to 1 message per second, but is not strong enough to deflect an
    702  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt excessive input rate from many sources at the same time.  </p>
    703  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    704  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> If a server is being hammered from multiple directions, consider
    705  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt raising the <a href="postconf.5.html#in_flow_delay">in_flow_delay</a> to 10 seconds, but only if the incoming
    706  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queue is growing even while the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> is not full and the
    707  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt trivial-rewrite service is using a fast transport lookup mechanism.
    708  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </p>
    709  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    710  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <h3> <a name="active_queue"> The "active" queue </a> </h3>
    711  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    712  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The queue manager is a delivery agent scheduler; it works to
    713  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt ensure fast and fair delivery of mail to all destinations within
    714  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt designated resource limits.  </p>
    715  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    716  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> is somewhat analogous to an operating system's
    717  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt process run queue. Messages in the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> are ready to be
    718  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt sent (runnable), but are not necessarily in the process of being
    719  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt sent (running).  </p>
    720  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    721  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> While most Postfix administrators think of the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active" queue</a>
    722  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt as a directory on disk, the real "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active" queue</a> is a set of data
    723  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt structures in the memory of the queue manager process.  </p>
    724  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    725  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Messages in the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#maildrop_queue">maildrop"</a>, "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#hold_queue">hold"</a>, "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming"</a> and "deferred"
    726  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queues (see below) do not occupy memory; they are safely stored on
    727  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt disk waiting for their turn to be processed. The envelope information
    728  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt for messages in the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active" queue</a> is managed in memory, allowing
    729  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the queue manager to do global scheduling, allocating available
    730  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt delivery agent processes to an appropriate message in the active
    731  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queue.  </p>
    732  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    733  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Within the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a>, (multi-recipient) messages are broken
    734  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt up into groups of recipients that share the same transport/nexthop
    735  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt combination; the group size is capped by the transport's recipient
    736  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt concurrency limit.  </p>
    737  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    738  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Multiple recipient groups (from one or more messages) are queued
    739  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt for delivery grouped by transport/nexthop combination. The
    740  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <b>destination</b> concurrency limit for the transports caps the number
    741  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt of simultaneous delivery attempts for each nexthop. Transports with
    742  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt a <b>recipient</b> concurrency limit of 1 are special: these are grouped
    743  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt by the actual recipient address rather than the nexthop, yielding
    744  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt per-recipient concurrency limits rather than per-domain
    745  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt concurrency limits. Per-recipient limits are appropriate when
    746  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt performing final delivery to mailboxes rather than when relaying
    747  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt to a remote server.  </p>
    748  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    749  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Congestion occurs in the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> when one or more destinations
    750  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt drain slower than the corresponding message input rate. </p>
    751  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    752  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Input into the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> comes both from new mail in the "incoming"
    753  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queue, and retries of mail in the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred" queue</a>. Should the "deferred"
    754  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queue get really large, retries of old mail can dominate the arrival
    755  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt rate of new mail. Systems with more CPU, faster disks and more network
    756  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt bandwidth can deal with larger <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queues</a>, but as a rule of thumb
    757  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a> scales to somewhere between 100,000 and 1,000,000
    758  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt messages with good performance unlikely above that "limit". Systems with
    759  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queues this large should typically stop accepting new mail, or put the
    760  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt backlog "on hold" until the underlying issue is fixed (provided that
    761  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt there is enough capacity to handle just the new mail). </p>
    762  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    763  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> When a destination is down for some time, the queue manager will
    764  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt mark it dead, and immediately defer all mail for the destination without
    765  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt trying to assign it to a delivery agent. In this case the messages
    766  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt will quickly leave the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> and end up in the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a>
    767  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt (with Postfix &lt; 2.4, this is done directly by the queue manager,
    768  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt with Postfix &ge; 2.4 this is done via the "retry" delivery agent). </p>
    769  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    770  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> When the destination is instead simply slow, or there is a problem
    771  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt causing an excessive arrival rate the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> will grow and will
    772  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt become dominated by mail to the congested destination.  </p>
    773  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    774  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The only way to reduce congestion is to either reduce the input
    775  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt rate or increase the throughput. Increasing the throughput requires
    776  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt either increasing the concurrency or reducing the latency of
    777  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt deliveries.  </p>
    778  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    779  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> For high volume sites a key tuning parameter is the number of
    780  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt "smtp" delivery agents allocated to the "smtp" and "relay" transports.
    781  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt High volume sites tend to send to many different destinations, many
    782  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt of which may be down or slow, so a good fraction of the available
    783  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt delivery agents will be blocked waiting for slow sites. Also mail
    784  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt destined across the globe will incur large SMTP command-response
    785  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt latencies, so high message throughput can only be achieved with
    786  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt more concurrent delivery agents.  </p>
    787  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    788  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The default "smtp" process limit of 100 is good enough for most
    789  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt sites, and may even need to be lowered for sites with low bandwidth
    790  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt connections (no use increasing concurrency once the network pipe
    791  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt is full). When one finds that the queue is growing on an "idle"
    792  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt system (CPU, disk I/O and network not exhausted) the remaining
    793  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt reason for congestion is insufficient concurrency in the face of
    794  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt a high average latency. If the number of outbound SMTP connections
    795  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt (either ESTABLISHED or SYN_SENT) reaches the process limit, mail
    796  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt is draining slowly and the system and network are not loaded, raise
    797  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the "smtp" and/or "relay" process limits!  </p>
    798  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    799  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> When a high volume destination is served by multiple MX hosts with
    800  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt typically low delivery latency, performance can suffer dramatically when
    801  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt one of the MX hosts is unresponsive and SMTP connections to that host
    802  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt timeout. For example, if there are 2 equal weight MX hosts, the SMTP
    803  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt connection timeout is 30 seconds and one of the MX hosts is down, the
    804  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt average SMTP connection will take approximately 15 seconds to complete.
    805  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt With a default per-destination concurrency limit of 20 connections,
    806  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt throughput falls to just over 1 message per second. </p>
    807  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    808  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The best way to avoid bottlenecks when one or more MX hosts is
    809  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt non-responsive is to use connection caching. Connection caching was
    810  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt introduced with Postfix 2.2 and is by default enabled on demand for
    811  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt destinations with a backlog of mail in the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a>. When connection
    812  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt caching is in effect for a particular destination, established connections
    813  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt are re-used to send additional messages, this reduces the number of
    814  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt connections made per message delivery and maintains good throughput even
    815  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt in the face of partial unavailability of the destination's MX hosts. </p>
    816  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    817  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> If connection caching is not available (Postfix &lt; 2.2) or does
    818  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt not provide a sufficient latency reduction, especially for the "relay"
    819  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt transport used to forward mail to "your own" domains, consider setting
    820  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt lower than default SMTP connection timeouts (1-5 seconds) and higher
    821  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt than default destination concurrency limits. This will further reduce
    822  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt latency and provide more concurrency to maintain throughput should
    823  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt latency rise. </p>
    824  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    825  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Setting high concurrency limits to domains that are not your own may
    826  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt be viewed as hostile by the receiving system, and steps may be taken
    827  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt to prevent you from monopolizing the destination system's resources.
    828  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt The defensive measures may substantially reduce your throughput or block
    829  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt access entirely. Do not set aggressive concurrency limits to remote
    830  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt domains without coordinating with the administrators of the target
    831  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt domain. </p>
    832  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    833  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> If necessary, dedicate and tune custom transports for selected high
    834  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt volume destinations. The "relay" transport is provided for forwarding mail
    835  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt to domains for which your server is a primary or backup MX host. These can
    836  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt make up a substantial fraction of your email traffic. Use the "relay" and
    837  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt not the "smtp" transport to send email to these domains. Using the "relay"
    838  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt transport allocates a separate delivery agent pool to these destinations
    839  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt and allows separate tuning of timeouts and concurrency limits. </p>
    840  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    841  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Another common cause of congestion is unwarranted flushing of the
    842  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt entire <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a>. The deferred queue holds messages that are likely
    843  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt to fail to be delivered and are also likely to be slow to fail delivery
    844  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt (time out). As a result the most common reaction to a large <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a>
    845  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt (flush it!) is more than likely counter-productive, and typically makes
    846  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the congestion worse. Do not flush the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a> unless you expect
    847  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt that most of its content has recently become deliverable (e.g. <a href="postconf.5.html#relayhost">relayhost</a>
    848  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt back up after an outage)!  </p>
    849  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    850  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Note that whenever the queue manager is restarted, there may
    851  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt already be messages in the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> directory, but the "real"
    852  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> in memory is empty. In order to recover the in-memory
    853  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt state, the queue manager moves all the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> messages
    854  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt back into the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming queue</a>, and then uses its normal incoming
    855  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queue scan to refill the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a>. The process of moving all
    856  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the messages back and forth, redoing transport table (<a href="trivial-rewrite.8.html">trivial-rewrite(8)</a>
    857  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt resolve service) lookups, and re-importing the messages back into
    858  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt memory is expensive. At all costs, avoid frequent restarts of the
    859  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queue manager (e.g. via frequent execution of "postfix reload").  </p>
    860  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    861  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <h3> <a name="deferred_queue"> The "deferred" queue </a> </h3>
    862  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    863  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> When all the deliverable recipients for a message are delivered,
    864  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt and for some recipients delivery failed for a transient reason (it
    865  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt might succeed later), the message is placed in the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a>.
    866  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </p>
    867  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    868  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The queue manager scans the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a> periodically. The scan
    869  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt interval is controlled by the <a href="postconf.5.html#queue_run_delay">queue_run_delay</a> parameter.  While a deferred
    870  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queue scan is in progress, if an <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming queue</a> scan is also in progress
    871  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt (ideally these are brief since the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming queue</a> should be short), the
    872  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queue manager alternates between looking for messages in the "incoming"
    873  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queue and in the "<a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred" queue</a>. This "round-robin" strategy prevents
    874  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt starvation of either the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#incoming_queue">incoming</a> or the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queues</a>.  </p>
    875  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    876  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> Each <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a> scan only brings a fraction of the deferred
    877  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queue back into the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> for a retry. This is because each
    878  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt message in the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a> is assigned a "cool-off" time when
    879  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt it is deferred.  This is done by time-warping the modification
    880  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt time of the queue file into the future. The queue file is not
    881  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt eligible for a retry if its modification time is not yet reached.
    882  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </p>
    883  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    884  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The "cool-off" time is at least $<a href="postconf.5.html#minimal_backoff_time">minimal_backoff_time</a> and at
    885  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt most $<a href="postconf.5.html#maximal_backoff_time">maximal_backoff_time</a>. The next retry time is set by doubling
    886  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the message's age in the queue, and adjusting up or down to lie
    887  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt within the limits. This means that young messages are initially
    888  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt retried more often than old messages.  </p>
    889  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    890  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> If a high volume site routinely has large <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queues</a>, it
    891  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt may be useful to adjust the <a href="postconf.5.html#queue_run_delay">queue_run_delay</a>, <a href="postconf.5.html#minimal_backoff_time">minimal_backoff_time</a> and
    892  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="postconf.5.html#maximal_backoff_time">maximal_backoff_time</a> to provide short enough delays on first failure
    893  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt (Postfix &ge; 2.4 has a sensibly low minimal backoff time by default),
    894  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt with perhaps longer delays after multiple failures, to reduce the
    895  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt retransmission rate of old messages and thereby reduce the quantity
    896  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt of previously deferred mail in the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a>.  If you want a really
    897  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt low <a href="postconf.5.html#minimal_backoff_time">minimal_backoff_time</a>, you may also want to lower <a href="postconf.5.html#queue_run_delay">queue_run_delay</a>,
    898  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt but understand that more frequent scans will increase the demand for
    899  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt disk I/O. </p>
    900  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    901  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> One common cause of large <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queues</a> is failure to validate
    902  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt recipients at the SMTP input stage. Since spammers routinely launch
    903  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt dictionary attacks from unrepliable sender addresses, the bounces
    904  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt for invalid recipient addresses clog the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a> (and at high
    905  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt volumes proportionally clog the <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a>). Recipient validation
    906  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt is strongly recommended through use of the <a href="postconf.5.html#local_recipient_maps">local_recipient_maps</a> and
    907  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <a href="postconf.5.html#relay_recipient_maps">relay_recipient_maps</a> parameters. Even when bounces drain quickly they
    908  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt inundate innocent victims of forgery with unwanted email. To avoid
    909  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt this, do not accept mail for invalid recipients. </p>
    910  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    911  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> When a host with lots of deferred mail is down for some time,
    912  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt it is possible for the entire <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#deferred_queue">deferred queue</a> to reach its retry
    913  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt time simultaneously. This can lead to a very full <a href="QSHAPE_README.html#active_queue">active queue</a> once
    914  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt the host comes back up. The phenomenon can repeat approximately
    915  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt every <a href="postconf.5.html#maximal_backoff_time">maximal_backoff_time</a> seconds if the messages are again deferred
    916  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt after a brief burst of congestion. Perhaps, a future Postfix release
    917  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt will add a random offset to the retry time (or use a combination
    918  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt of strategies) to reduce the odds of repeated complete deferred
    919  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt queue flushes.  </p>
    920  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    921  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <h2><a name="credits">Credits</a></h2>
    922  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    923  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt <p> The <a href="qshape.1.html">qshape(1)</a> program was developed by Victor Duchovni of Morgan
    924  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt Stanley, who also wrote the initial version of this document.  </p>
    925  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    926  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </body>
    927  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt 
    928  1.1.1.1.4.2  matt </html>
    929