pthread_tsd.c revision 1.11.8.1 1 /* $NetBSD: pthread_tsd.c,v 1.11.8.1 2015/11/24 17:37:16 martin Exp $ */
2
3 /*-
4 * Copyright (c) 2001, 2007 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
5 * All rights reserved.
6 *
7 * This code is derived from software contributed to The NetBSD Foundation
8 * by Nathan J. Williams, by Andrew Doran, and by Christos Zoulas.
9 *
10 * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
11 * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
12 * are met:
13 * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
14 * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
15 * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
16 * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
17 * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
18 *
19 * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE NETBSD FOUNDATION, INC. AND CONTRIBUTORS
20 * ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
21 * TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
22 * PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE FOUNDATION OR CONTRIBUTORS
23 * BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
24 * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
25 * SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
26 * INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
27 * CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
28 * ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
29 * POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
30 */
31
32 #include <sys/cdefs.h>
33 __RCSID("$NetBSD: pthread_tsd.c,v 1.11.8.1 2015/11/24 17:37:16 martin Exp $");
34
35 /* Functions and structures dealing with thread-specific data */
36 #include <errno.h>
37 #include <sys/mman.h>
38
39 #include "pthread.h"
40 #include "pthread_int.h"
41 #include "reentrant.h"
42
43 int pthread_keys_max;
44 static pthread_mutex_t tsd_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
45 static int nextkey;
46
47 PTQ_HEAD(pthread__tsd_list, pt_specific) *pthread__tsd_list = NULL;
48 void (**pthread__tsd_destructors)(void *) = NULL;
49
50 __strong_alias(__libc_thr_keycreate,pthread_key_create)
51 __strong_alias(__libc_thr_keydelete,pthread_key_delete)
52
53 static void
54 /*ARGSUSED*/
55 null_destructor(void *p)
56 {
57 }
58
59 #include <err.h>
60 #include <stdlib.h>
61 #include <stdio.h>
62
63 /* Can't use mmap directly so early in the process because rump hijacks it */
64 void *_mmap(void *, size_t, int, int, int, off_t);
65
66 void *
67 pthread_tsd_init(size_t *tlen)
68 {
69 char *pkm;
70 size_t alen;
71 char *arena;
72
73 if ((pkm = pthread__getenv("PTHREAD_KEYS_MAX")) != NULL) {
74 pthread_keys_max = (int)strtol(pkm, NULL, 0);
75 if (pthread_keys_max < _POSIX_THREAD_KEYS_MAX)
76 pthread_keys_max = _POSIX_THREAD_KEYS_MAX;
77 } else {
78 pthread_keys_max = PTHREAD_KEYS_MAX;
79 }
80
81 /*
82 * Can't use malloc here yet, because malloc will use the fake
83 * libc thread functions to initialize itself, so mmap the space.
84 */
85 *tlen = sizeof(struct __pthread_st)
86 + pthread_keys_max * sizeof(struct pt_specific);
87 alen = *tlen
88 + sizeof(*pthread__tsd_list) * pthread_keys_max
89 + sizeof(*pthread__tsd_destructors) * pthread_keys_max;
90
91 arena = _mmap(NULL, alen, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANON, -1, 0);
92 if (arena == MAP_FAILED) {
93 pthread_keys_max = 0;
94 return NULL;
95 }
96
97 pthread__tsd_list = (void *)arena;
98 arena += sizeof(*pthread__tsd_list) * pthread_keys_max;
99 pthread__tsd_destructors = (void *)arena;
100 arena += sizeof(*pthread__tsd_destructors) * pthread_keys_max;
101 return arena;
102 }
103
104 int
105 pthread_key_create(pthread_key_t *key, void (*destructor)(void *))
106 {
107 int i;
108
109 if (__predict_false(__uselibcstub))
110 return __libc_thr_keycreate_stub(key, destructor);
111
112 /* Get a lock on the allocation list */
113 pthread_mutex_lock(&tsd_mutex);
114
115 /* Find an available slot:
116 * The condition for an available slot is one with the destructor
117 * not being NULL. If the desired destructor is NULL we set it to
118 * our own internal destructor to satisfy the non NULL condition.
119 */
120 /* 1. Search from "nextkey" to the end of the list. */
121 for (i = nextkey; i < pthread_keys_max; i++)
122 if (pthread__tsd_destructors[i] == NULL)
123 break;
124
125 if (i == pthread_keys_max) {
126 /* 2. If that didn't work, search from the start
127 * of the list back to "nextkey".
128 */
129 for (i = 0; i < nextkey; i++)
130 if (pthread__tsd_destructors[i] == NULL)
131 break;
132
133 if (i == nextkey) {
134 /* If we didn't find one here, there isn't one
135 * to be found.
136 */
137 pthread_mutex_unlock(&tsd_mutex);
138 return EAGAIN;
139 }
140 }
141
142 /* Got one. */
143 pthread__assert(PTQ_EMPTY(&pthread__tsd_list[i]));
144 pthread__tsd_destructors[i] = destructor ? destructor : null_destructor;
145
146 nextkey = (i + 1) % pthread_keys_max;
147 pthread_mutex_unlock(&tsd_mutex);
148 *key = i;
149
150 return 0;
151 }
152
153 /*
154 * Each thread holds an array of pthread_keys_max pt_specific list
155 * elements. When an element is used it is inserted into the appropriate
156 * key bucket of pthread__tsd_list. This means that ptqe_prev == NULL,
157 * means that the element is not threaded, ptqe_prev != NULL it is
158 * already part of the list. When we set to a NULL value we delete from the
159 * list if it was in the list, and when we set to non-NULL value, we insert
160 * in the list if it was not already there.
161 *
162 * We keep this global array of lists of threads that have called
163 * pthread_set_specific with non-null values, for each key so that
164 * we don't have to check all threads for non-NULL values in
165 * pthread_key_destroy
166 *
167 * We could keep an accounting of the number of specific used
168 * entries per thread, so that we can update pt_havespecific when we delete
169 * the last one, but we don't bother for now
170 */
171 int
172 pthread__add_specific(pthread_t self, pthread_key_t key, const void *value)
173 {
174 struct pt_specific *pt;
175
176 pthread__assert(key >= 0 && key < pthread_keys_max);
177
178 pthread_mutex_lock(&tsd_mutex);
179 pthread__assert(pthread__tsd_destructors[key] != NULL);
180 pt = &self->pt_specific[key];
181 self->pt_havespecific = 1;
182 if (value) {
183 if (pt->pts_next.ptqe_prev == NULL)
184 PTQ_INSERT_HEAD(&pthread__tsd_list[key], pt, pts_next);
185 } else {
186 if (pt->pts_next.ptqe_prev != NULL) {
187 PTQ_REMOVE(&pthread__tsd_list[key], pt, pts_next);
188 pt->pts_next.ptqe_prev = NULL;
189 }
190 }
191 pt->pts_value = __UNCONST(value);
192 pthread_mutex_unlock(&tsd_mutex);
193
194 return 0;
195 }
196
197 int
198 pthread_key_delete(pthread_key_t key)
199 {
200 /*
201 * This is tricky. The standard says of pthread_key_create()
202 * that new keys have the value NULL associated with them in
203 * all threads. According to people who were present at the
204 * standardization meeting, that requirement was written
205 * before pthread_key_delete() was introduced, and not
206 * reconsidered when it was.
207 *
208 * See David Butenhof's article in comp.programming.threads:
209 * Subject: Re: TSD key reusing issue
210 * Message-ID: <u97d8.29$fL6.200 (at) news.cpqcorp.net>
211 * Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 09:06:17 -0500
212 * http://groups.google.com/groups?\
213 * hl=en&selm=u97d8.29%24fL6.200%40news.cpqcorp.net
214 *
215 * Given:
216 *
217 * 1: Applications are not required to clear keys in all
218 * threads before calling pthread_key_delete().
219 * 2: Clearing pointers without running destructors is a
220 * memory leak.
221 * 3: The pthread_key_delete() function is expressly forbidden
222 * to run any destructors.
223 *
224 * Option 1: Make this function effectively a no-op and
225 * prohibit key reuse. This is a possible resource-exhaustion
226 * problem given that we have a static storage area for keys,
227 * but having a non-static storage area would make
228 * pthread_setspecific() expensive (might need to realloc the
229 * TSD array).
230 *
231 * Option 2: Ignore the specified behavior of
232 * pthread_key_create() and leave the old values. If an
233 * application deletes a key that still has non-NULL values in
234 * some threads... it's probably a memory leak and hence
235 * incorrect anyway, and we're within our rights to let the
236 * application lose. However, it's possible (if unlikely) that
237 * the application is storing pointers to non-heap data, or
238 * non-pointers that have been wedged into a void pointer, so
239 * we can't entirely write off such applications as incorrect.
240 * This could also lead to running (new) destructors on old
241 * data that was never supposed to be associated with that
242 * destructor.
243 *
244 * Option 3: Follow the specified behavior of
245 * pthread_key_create(). Either pthread_key_create() or
246 * pthread_key_delete() would then have to clear the values in
247 * every thread's slot for that key. In order to guarantee the
248 * visibility of the NULL value in other threads, there would
249 * have to be synchronization operations in both the clearer
250 * and pthread_getspecific(). Putting synchronization in
251 * pthread_getspecific() is a big performance lose. But in
252 * reality, only (buggy) reuse of an old key would require
253 * this synchronization; for a new key, there has to be a
254 * memory-visibility propagating event between the call to
255 * pthread_key_create() and pthread_getspecific() with that
256 * key, so setting the entries to NULL without synchronization
257 * will work, subject to problem (2) above. However, it's kind
258 * of slow.
259 *
260 * Note that the argument in option 3 only applies because we
261 * keep TSD in ordinary memory which follows the pthreads
262 * visibility rules. The visibility rules are not required by
263 * the standard to apply to TSD, so the argument doesn't
264 * apply in general, just to this implementation.
265 */
266
267 /*
268 * We do option 3; we find the list of all pt_specific structures
269 * threaded on the key we are deleting, unthread them, and set the
270 * pointer to NULL. Finally we unthread the entry, freeing it for
271 * further use.
272 *
273 * We don't call the destructor here, it is the responsibility
274 * of the application to cleanup the storage:
275 * http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/\
276 * pthread_key_delete.html
277 */
278 struct pt_specific *pt;
279
280 if (__predict_false(__uselibcstub))
281 return __libc_thr_keydelete_stub(key);
282
283 pthread__assert(key >= 0 && key < pthread_keys_max);
284
285 pthread_mutex_lock(&tsd_mutex);
286
287 pthread__assert(pthread__tsd_destructors[key] != NULL);
288
289 while ((pt = PTQ_FIRST(&pthread__tsd_list[key])) != NULL) {
290 PTQ_REMOVE(&pthread__tsd_list[key], pt, pts_next);
291 pt->pts_value = NULL;
292 pt->pts_next.ptqe_prev = NULL;
293 }
294
295 pthread__tsd_destructors[key] = NULL;
296 pthread_mutex_unlock(&tsd_mutex);
297
298 return 0;
299 }
300
301 /* Perform thread-exit-time destruction of thread-specific data. */
302 void
303 pthread__destroy_tsd(pthread_t self)
304 {
305 int i, done, iterations;
306 void *val;
307 void (*destructor)(void *);
308
309 if (!self->pt_havespecific)
310 return;
311 pthread_mutex_unlock(&self->pt_lock);
312
313 /* Butenhof, section 5.4.2 (page 167):
314 *
315 * ``Also, Pthreads sets the thread-specific data value for a
316 * key to NULL before calling that key's destructor (passing
317 * the previous value of the key) when a thread terminates [*].
318 * ...
319 * [*] That is, unfortunately, not what the standard
320 * says. This is one of the problems with formal standards -
321 * they say what they say, not what they were intended to
322 * say. Somehow, an error crept in, and the sentence
323 * specifying that "the implementation clears the
324 * thread-specific data value before calling the destructor"
325 * was deleted. Nobody noticed, and the standard was approved
326 * with the error. So the standard says (by omission) that if
327 * you want to write a portable application using
328 * thread-specific data, that will not hang on thread
329 * termination, you must call pthread_setspecific within your
330 * destructor function to change the value to NULL. This would
331 * be silly, and any serious implementation of Pthreads will
332 * violate the standard in this respect. Of course, the
333 * standard will be fixed, probably by the 1003.1n amendment
334 * (assorted corrections to 1003.1c-1995), but that will take
335 * a while.''
336 */
337
338 iterations = 4; /* We're not required to try very hard */
339 do {
340 done = 1;
341 for (i = 0; i < pthread_keys_max; i++) {
342 struct pt_specific *pt = &self->pt_specific[i];
343 if (pt->pts_next.ptqe_prev == NULL)
344 continue;
345 pthread_mutex_lock(&tsd_mutex);
346
347 if (pt->pts_next.ptqe_prev != NULL) {
348 PTQ_REMOVE(&pthread__tsd_list[i], pt, pts_next);
349 val = pt->pts_value;
350 pt->pts_value = NULL;
351 pt->pts_next.ptqe_prev = NULL;
352 destructor = pthread__tsd_destructors[i];
353 } else
354 destructor = NULL;
355
356 pthread_mutex_unlock(&tsd_mutex);
357 if (destructor != NULL) {
358 done = 0;
359 (*destructor)(val);
360 }
361 }
362 } while (!done && iterations--);
363
364 self->pt_havespecific = 0;
365 pthread_mutex_lock(&self->pt_lock);
366 }
367