pthread_tsd.c revision 1.16.6.1 1 /* $NetBSD: pthread_tsd.c,v 1.16.6.1 2019/06/10 22:05:26 christos Exp $ */
2
3 /*-
4 * Copyright (c) 2001, 2007 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
5 * All rights reserved.
6 *
7 * This code is derived from software contributed to The NetBSD Foundation
8 * by Nathan J. Williams, by Andrew Doran, and by Christos Zoulas.
9 *
10 * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
11 * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
12 * are met:
13 * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
14 * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
15 * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
16 * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
17 * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
18 *
19 * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE NETBSD FOUNDATION, INC. AND CONTRIBUTORS
20 * ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
21 * TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
22 * PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE FOUNDATION OR CONTRIBUTORS
23 * BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
24 * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
25 * SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
26 * INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
27 * CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
28 * ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
29 * POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
30 */
31
32 #include <sys/cdefs.h>
33 __RCSID("$NetBSD: pthread_tsd.c,v 1.16.6.1 2019/06/10 22:05:26 christos Exp $");
34
35 /* Functions and structures dealing with thread-specific data */
36 #include <errno.h>
37 #include <sys/mman.h>
38
39 #include "pthread.h"
40 #include "pthread_int.h"
41 #include "reentrant.h"
42 #include "tsd.h"
43
44 int pthread_keys_max;
45 static pthread_mutex_t tsd_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
46 static int nextkey;
47
48 PTQ_HEAD(pthread__tsd_list, pt_specific) *pthread__tsd_list = NULL;
49 void (**pthread__tsd_destructors)(void *) = NULL;
50
51 __strong_alias(__libc_thr_keycreate,pthread_key_create)
52 __strong_alias(__libc_thr_keydelete,pthread_key_delete)
53
54 static void
55 /*ARGSUSED*/
56 null_destructor(void *p)
57 {
58 }
59
60 #include <err.h>
61 #include <stdlib.h>
62 #include <stdio.h>
63
64 void *
65 pthread_tsd_init(size_t *tlen)
66 {
67 char *pkm;
68 size_t alen;
69 char *arena;
70
71 if ((pkm = pthread__getenv("PTHREAD_KEYS_MAX")) != NULL) {
72 pthread_keys_max = (int)strtol(pkm, NULL, 0);
73 if (pthread_keys_max < _POSIX_THREAD_KEYS_MAX)
74 pthread_keys_max = _POSIX_THREAD_KEYS_MAX;
75 } else {
76 pthread_keys_max = PTHREAD_KEYS_MAX;
77 }
78
79 /*
80 * Can't use malloc here yet, because malloc will use the fake
81 * libc thread functions to initialize itself, so mmap the space.
82 */
83 *tlen = sizeof(struct __pthread_st)
84 + pthread_keys_max * sizeof(struct pt_specific);
85 alen = *tlen
86 + sizeof(*pthread__tsd_list) * pthread_keys_max
87 + sizeof(*pthread__tsd_destructors) * pthread_keys_max;
88
89 arena = mmap(NULL, alen, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANON, -1, 0);
90 if (arena == MAP_FAILED) {
91 pthread_keys_max = 0;
92 return NULL;
93 }
94
95 pthread__tsd_list = (void *)arena;
96 arena += sizeof(*pthread__tsd_list) * pthread_keys_max;
97 pthread__tsd_destructors = (void *)arena;
98 arena += sizeof(*pthread__tsd_destructors) * pthread_keys_max;
99 return arena;
100 }
101
102 int
103 pthread_key_create(pthread_key_t *key, void (*destructor)(void *))
104 {
105 int i;
106
107 if (__predict_false(__uselibcstub))
108 return __libc_thr_keycreate_stub(key, destructor);
109
110 /* Get a lock on the allocation list */
111 pthread_mutex_lock(&tsd_mutex);
112
113 /* Find an available slot:
114 * The condition for an available slot is one with the destructor
115 * not being NULL. If the desired destructor is NULL we set it to
116 * our own internal destructor to satisfy the non NULL condition.
117 */
118 /* 1. Search from "nextkey" to the end of the list. */
119 for (i = nextkey; i < pthread_keys_max; i++)
120 if (pthread__tsd_destructors[i] == NULL)
121 break;
122
123 if (i == pthread_keys_max) {
124 /* 2. If that didn't work, search from the start
125 * of the list back to "nextkey".
126 */
127 for (i = 0; i < nextkey; i++)
128 if (pthread__tsd_destructors[i] == NULL)
129 break;
130
131 if (i == nextkey) {
132 /* If we didn't find one here, there isn't one
133 * to be found.
134 */
135 pthread_mutex_unlock(&tsd_mutex);
136 return EAGAIN;
137 }
138 }
139
140 /* Got one. */
141 pthread__assert(PTQ_EMPTY(&pthread__tsd_list[i]));
142 pthread__tsd_destructors[i] = destructor ? destructor : null_destructor;
143
144 nextkey = (i + 1) % pthread_keys_max;
145 pthread_mutex_unlock(&tsd_mutex);
146 *key = i;
147
148 return 0;
149 }
150
151 /*
152 * Each thread holds an array of pthread_keys_max pt_specific list
153 * elements. When an element is used it is inserted into the appropriate
154 * key bucket of pthread__tsd_list. This means that ptqe_prev == NULL,
155 * means that the element is not threaded, ptqe_prev != NULL it is
156 * already part of the list. When we set to a NULL value we delete from the
157 * list if it was in the list, and when we set to non-NULL value, we insert
158 * in the list if it was not already there.
159 *
160 * We keep this global array of lists of threads that have called
161 * pthread_set_specific with non-null values, for each key so that
162 * we don't have to check all threads for non-NULL values in
163 * pthread_key_destroy
164 *
165 * We could keep an accounting of the number of specific used
166 * entries per thread, so that we can update pt_havespecific when we delete
167 * the last one, but we don't bother for now
168 */
169 int
170 pthread__add_specific(pthread_t self, pthread_key_t key, const void *value)
171 {
172 struct pt_specific *pt;
173
174 pthread__assert(key >= 0 && key < pthread_keys_max);
175
176 pthread_mutex_lock(&tsd_mutex);
177 pthread__assert(pthread__tsd_destructors[key] != NULL);
178 pt = &self->pt_specific[key];
179 self->pt_havespecific = 1;
180 if (value) {
181 if (pt->pts_next.ptqe_prev == NULL)
182 PTQ_INSERT_HEAD(&pthread__tsd_list[key], pt, pts_next);
183 } else {
184 if (pt->pts_next.ptqe_prev != NULL) {
185 PTQ_REMOVE(&pthread__tsd_list[key], pt, pts_next);
186 pt->pts_next.ptqe_prev = NULL;
187 }
188 }
189 pt->pts_value = __UNCONST(value);
190 pthread_mutex_unlock(&tsd_mutex);
191
192 return 0;
193 }
194
195 int
196 pthread_key_delete(pthread_key_t key)
197 {
198 /*
199 * This is tricky. The standard says of pthread_key_create()
200 * that new keys have the value NULL associated with them in
201 * all threads. According to people who were present at the
202 * standardization meeting, that requirement was written
203 * before pthread_key_delete() was introduced, and not
204 * reconsidered when it was.
205 *
206 * See David Butenhof's article in comp.programming.threads:
207 * Subject: Re: TSD key reusing issue
208 * Message-ID: <u97d8.29$fL6.200 (at) news.cpqcorp.net>
209 * Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 09:06:17 -0500
210 * http://groups.google.com/groups?\
211 * hl=en&selm=u97d8.29%24fL6.200%40news.cpqcorp.net
212 *
213 * Given:
214 *
215 * 1: Applications are not required to clear keys in all
216 * threads before calling pthread_key_delete().
217 * 2: Clearing pointers without running destructors is a
218 * memory leak.
219 * 3: The pthread_key_delete() function is expressly forbidden
220 * to run any destructors.
221 *
222 * Option 1: Make this function effectively a no-op and
223 * prohibit key reuse. This is a possible resource-exhaustion
224 * problem given that we have a static storage area for keys,
225 * but having a non-static storage area would make
226 * pthread_setspecific() expensive (might need to realloc the
227 * TSD array).
228 *
229 * Option 2: Ignore the specified behavior of
230 * pthread_key_create() and leave the old values. If an
231 * application deletes a key that still has non-NULL values in
232 * some threads... it's probably a memory leak and hence
233 * incorrect anyway, and we're within our rights to let the
234 * application lose. However, it's possible (if unlikely) that
235 * the application is storing pointers to non-heap data, or
236 * non-pointers that have been wedged into a void pointer, so
237 * we can't entirely write off such applications as incorrect.
238 * This could also lead to running (new) destructors on old
239 * data that was never supposed to be associated with that
240 * destructor.
241 *
242 * Option 3: Follow the specified behavior of
243 * pthread_key_create(). Either pthread_key_create() or
244 * pthread_key_delete() would then have to clear the values in
245 * every thread's slot for that key. In order to guarantee the
246 * visibility of the NULL value in other threads, there would
247 * have to be synchronization operations in both the clearer
248 * and pthread_getspecific(). Putting synchronization in
249 * pthread_getspecific() is a big performance lose. But in
250 * reality, only (buggy) reuse of an old key would require
251 * this synchronization; for a new key, there has to be a
252 * memory-visibility propagating event between the call to
253 * pthread_key_create() and pthread_getspecific() with that
254 * key, so setting the entries to NULL without synchronization
255 * will work, subject to problem (2) above. However, it's kind
256 * of slow.
257 *
258 * Note that the argument in option 3 only applies because we
259 * keep TSD in ordinary memory which follows the pthreads
260 * visibility rules. The visibility rules are not required by
261 * the standard to apply to TSD, so the argument doesn't
262 * apply in general, just to this implementation.
263 */
264
265 /*
266 * We do option 3; we find the list of all pt_specific structures
267 * threaded on the key we are deleting, unthread them, and set the
268 * pointer to NULL. Finally we unthread the entry, freeing it for
269 * further use.
270 *
271 * We don't call the destructor here, it is the responsibility
272 * of the application to cleanup the storage:
273 * http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/\
274 * pthread_key_delete.html
275 */
276 struct pt_specific *pt;
277
278 if (__predict_false(__uselibcstub))
279 return __libc_thr_keydelete_stub(key);
280
281 pthread__assert(key >= 0 && key < pthread_keys_max);
282
283 pthread_mutex_lock(&tsd_mutex);
284
285 pthread__assert(pthread__tsd_destructors[key] != NULL);
286
287 while ((pt = PTQ_FIRST(&pthread__tsd_list[key])) != NULL) {
288 PTQ_REMOVE(&pthread__tsd_list[key], pt, pts_next);
289 pt->pts_value = NULL;
290 pt->pts_next.ptqe_prev = NULL;
291 }
292
293 pthread__tsd_destructors[key] = NULL;
294 pthread_mutex_unlock(&tsd_mutex);
295
296 return 0;
297 }
298
299 /* Perform thread-exit-time destruction of thread-specific data. */
300 void
301 pthread__destroy_tsd(pthread_t self)
302 {
303 int i, done, iterations;
304 void *val;
305 void (*destructor)(void *);
306
307 if (!self->pt_havespecific)
308 return;
309 pthread_mutex_unlock(&self->pt_lock);
310
311 /* Butenhof, section 5.4.2 (page 167):
312 *
313 * ``Also, Pthreads sets the thread-specific data value for a
314 * key to NULL before calling that key's destructor (passing
315 * the previous value of the key) when a thread terminates [*].
316 * ...
317 * [*] That is, unfortunately, not what the standard
318 * says. This is one of the problems with formal standards -
319 * they say what they say, not what they were intended to
320 * say. Somehow, an error crept in, and the sentence
321 * specifying that "the implementation clears the
322 * thread-specific data value before calling the destructor"
323 * was deleted. Nobody noticed, and the standard was approved
324 * with the error. So the standard says (by omission) that if
325 * you want to write a portable application using
326 * thread-specific data, that will not hang on thread
327 * termination, you must call pthread_setspecific within your
328 * destructor function to change the value to NULL. This would
329 * be silly, and any serious implementation of Pthreads will
330 * violate the standard in this respect. Of course, the
331 * standard will be fixed, probably by the 1003.1n amendment
332 * (assorted corrections to 1003.1c-1995), but that will take
333 * a while.''
334 */
335
336 /* We're not required to try very hard */
337 iterations = PTHREAD_DESTRUCTOR_ITERATIONS;
338 do {
339 done = 1;
340 for (i = 0; i < pthread_keys_max; i++) {
341 struct pt_specific *pt = &self->pt_specific[i];
342 if (pt->pts_next.ptqe_prev == NULL)
343 continue;
344 pthread_mutex_lock(&tsd_mutex);
345
346 if (pt->pts_next.ptqe_prev != NULL) {
347 PTQ_REMOVE(&pthread__tsd_list[i], pt, pts_next);
348 val = pt->pts_value;
349 pt->pts_value = NULL;
350 pt->pts_next.ptqe_prev = NULL;
351 destructor = pthread__tsd_destructors[i];
352 } else
353 destructor = NULL;
354
355 pthread_mutex_unlock(&tsd_mutex);
356 if (destructor != NULL) {
357 done = 0;
358 (*destructor)(val);
359 }
360 }
361 } while (!done && --iterations);
362
363 self->pt_havespecific = 0;
364 pthread_mutex_lock(&self->pt_lock);
365 }
366
367 void
368 pthread__copy_tsd(pthread_t self)
369 {
370 for (size_t key = 0; key < TSD_KEYS_MAX; key++) {
371
372 if (__libc_tsd[key].tsd_inuse == 0)
373 continue;
374
375 pthread__assert(pthread__tsd_destructors[key] == NULL);
376 pthread__tsd_destructors[key] = __libc_tsd[key].tsd_dtor ?
377 __libc_tsd[key].tsd_dtor : null_destructor;
378 nextkey = (key + 1) % pthread_keys_max;
379
380 self->pt_havespecific = 1;
381 struct pt_specific *pt = &self->pt_specific[key];
382 pt->pts_value = __libc_tsd[key].tsd_val;
383 __libc_tsd[key].tsd_inuse = 0;
384 }
385 }
386