NOTES revision 1.2 1 1.2 cgd $NetBSD: NOTES,v 1.2 1995/03/18 14:56:29 cgd Exp $
2 1.2 cgd
3 1.1 pk POSIX and init:
4 1.1 pk --------------
5 1.1 pk
6 1.1 pk POSIX.1 does not define 'init' but it mentions it in a few places.
7 1.1 pk
8 1.1 pk B.2.2.2, p205 line 873:
9 1.1 pk
10 1.1 pk This is part of the extensive 'job control' glossary entry.
11 1.1 pk This specific reference says that 'init' must by default provide
12 1.1 pk protection from job control signals to jobs it starts --
13 1.1 pk it sets SIGTSTP, SIGTTIN and SIGTTOU to SIG_IGN.
14 1.1 pk
15 1.1 pk B.2.2.2, p206 line 889:
16 1.1 pk
17 1.1 pk Here is a reference to 'vhangup'. It says, 'POSIX.1 does
18 1.1 pk not specify how controlling terminal access is affected by
19 1.1 pk a user logging out (that is, by a controlling process
20 1.1 pk terminating).' vhangup() is recognized as one way to handle
21 1.1 pk the problem. I'm not clear what happens in Reno; I have
22 1.1 pk the impression that when the controlling process terminates,
23 1.1 pk references to the controlling terminal are converted to
24 1.1 pk references to a 'dead' vnode. I don't know whether vhangup()
25 1.1 pk is required.
26 1.1 pk
27 1.1 pk B.2.2.2, p206 line 921:
28 1.1 pk
29 1.1 pk Orphaned process groups bear indirectly on this issue. A
30 1.1 pk session leader's process group is considered to be orphaned;
31 1.1 pk that is, it's immune to job control signals from the terminal.
32 1.1 pk
33 1.1 pk B.2.2.2, p233 line 2055:
34 1.1 pk
35 1.1 pk 'Historically, the implementation-dependent process that
36 1.1 pk inherits children whose parents have terminated without
37 1.1 pk waiting on them is called "init" and has a process ID of 1.'
38 1.1 pk
39 1.1 pk It goes on to note that it used to be the case that 'init'
40 1.1 pk was responsible for sending SIGHUP to the foreground process
41 1.1 pk group of a tty whose controlling process has exited, using
42 1.1 pk vhangup(). It is now the responsibility of the kernel to
43 1.1 pk do this when the controlling process calls _exit(). The
44 1.1 pk kernel is also responsible for sending SIGCONT to stopped
45 1.1 pk process groups that become orphaned. This is like old BSD
46 1.1 pk but entire process groups are signaled instead of individual
47 1.1 pk processes.
48 1.1 pk
49 1.1 pk In general it appears that the kernel now automatically
50 1.1 pk takes care of orphans, relieving 'init' of any responsibility.
51 1.1 pk Specifics are listed on the _exit() page (p50).
52 1.1 pk
53 1.1 pk On setsid():
54 1.1 pk -----------
55 1.1 pk
56 1.1 pk It appears that neither getty nor login call setsid(), so init must
57 1.1 pk do this -- seems reasonable. B.4.3.2 p 248 implies that this is the
58 1.1 pk way that 'init' should work; it says that setsid() should be called
59 1.1 pk after forking.
60 1.1 pk
61 1.1 pk Process group leaders cannot call setsid() -- another reason to
62 1.1 pk fork! Of course setsid() causes the current process to become a
63 1.1 pk process group leader, so we can only call setsid() once. Note that
64 1.1 pk the controlling terminal acquires the session leader's process
65 1.1 pk group when opened.
66 1.1 pk
67 1.1 pk Controlling terminals:
68 1.1 pk ---------------------
69 1.1 pk
70 1.1 pk B.7.1.1.3 p276: 'POSIX.1 does not specify a mechanism by which to
71 1.1 pk allocate a controlling terminal. This is normally done by a system
72 1.1 pk utility (such as 'getty') and is considered ... outside the scope
73 1.1 pk of POSIX.1.' It goes on to say that historically the first open()
74 1.1 pk of a tty in a session sets the controlling terminal. P130 has the
75 1.1 pk full details; nothing particularly surprising.
76 1.1 pk
77 1.1 pk The glossary p12 describes a 'controlling process' as the first
78 1.1 pk process in a session that acquires a controlling terminal. Access
79 1.1 pk to the terminal from the session is revoked if the controlling
80 1.1 pk process exits (see p50, in the discussion of process termination).
81 1.1 pk
82 1.1 pk Design notes:
83 1.1 pk ------------
84 1.1 pk
85 1.1 pk your generic finite state machine
86 1.1 pk we are fascist about which signals we elect to receive,
87 1.1 pk even signals purportedly generated by hardware
88 1.1 pk handle fatal errors gracefully if possible (we reboot if we goof!!)
89 1.1 pk if we get a segmentation fault etc., print a message on the console
90 1.1 pk and spin for a while before rebooting
91 1.1 pk (this at least decreases the amount of paper consumed :-)
92 1.1 pk apply hysteresis to rapidly exiting gettys
93 1.1 pk check wait status of children we reap
94 1.1 pk don't wait for stopped children
95 1.1 pk don't use SIGCHILD, it's too expensive
96 1.1 pk but it may close windows and avoid races, sigh
97 1.1 pk look for EINTR in case we need to change state
98 1.1 pk init is responsible for utmp and wtmp maintenance (ick)
99 1.1 pk maybe now we can consider replacements? maintain them in parallel
100 1.1 pk init only removes utmp and closes out wtmp entries...
101 1.1 pk
102 1.1 pk necessary states and state transitions (gleaned from the man page):
103 1.1 pk 1: single user shell (with password checking?); on exit, go to 2
104 1.1 pk 2: rc script: on exit 0, go to 3; on exit N (error), go to 1
105 1.1 pk 3: read ttys file: on completion, go to 4
106 1.1 pk 4: multi-user operation: on SIGTERM, go to 7; on SIGHUP, go to 5;
107 1.1 pk on SIGTSTP, go to 6
108 1.1 pk 5: clean up mode (re-read ttys file, killing off controlling processes
109 1.1 pk on lines that are now 'off', starting them on lines newly 'on')
110 1.1 pk on completion, go to 4
111 1.1 pk 6: boring mode (no new sessions); signals as in 4
112 1.1 pk 7: death: send SIGHUP to all controlling processes, reap for 30 seconds,
113 1.1 pk then go to 1 (warn if not all processes died, i.e. wait blocks)
114 1.1 pk Given the -s flag, we start at state 1; otherwise state 2
115