Cross Reference: /src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/expr

History log of /src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/expr_binary.c
Revision	Date	Author	Comments
1.10	12-Apr-2025	rillig	lint: s/illegal/invalid/g Lint does not provide legal advice.
1.9	27-Feb-2025	rillig	tests/lint: spell out the type combinations for the '?:' operator
1.8	14-Jul-2023	rillig	branches: 1.8.2; lint: clean up comments, add a test for the '?:' operator
1.7	28-Mar-2023	rillig	lint: warn about extern declarations outside headers https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-userlevel/2023/03/15/msg013727.html
1.6	17-Jun-2022	rillig	tests/lint: make 'expect+-' comments stricter Previously, the expectations from these comments were already satisfied if the expectation occurred somewhere in the actual message from lint. This meant that the prefix 'error:' or 'warning:' could be omitted from the 'expect' comment. These omissions were hard to see in a manual review. Now any omissions must be visually marked with '...'. The test msg_342 now reports its messages properly as being in the file msg_342.c, rather than msg_341.c. This had been a copy-and-paste mistake.
1.5	01-Aug-2021	rillig	tests/lint: re-add the test for __uint128_t
1.4	01-Aug-2021	rillig	tests/lint: fully cover the usual arithmetic conversions
1.3	01-Aug-2021	rillig	lint: fix usual arithmetic conversions for 128-bit integer types
1.2	01-Aug-2021	rillig	lint: demonstrate wrong integer conversion for __uint128_t
1.1	01-Aug-2021	rillig	tests/lint: test the usual arithmetic conversions The function 'balance' does not mention __uint128_t and nevertheless works as expected. Need to investigate further.
1.8.2.1	02-Aug-2025	perseant	Sync with HEAD

OpenGrok