expr_binary.c revision 1.7 1 /* $NetBSD: expr_binary.c,v 1.7 2023/03/28 14:44:34 rillig Exp $ */
2 # 3 "expr_binary.c"
3
4 /*
5 * Test binary operators.
6 */
7
8 /* lint1-only-if: lp64 */
9 /* lint1-extra-flags: -X 351 */
10
11 struct incompatible { /* just to generate the error message */
12 int member;
13 };
14 void sink(struct incompatible);
15
16 /*
17 * Test the usual arithmetic conversions.
18 *
19 * C99 6.3.1.8 "Usual arithmetic conversions"
20 */
21 void
22 cover_balance(void)
23 {
24 /* expect+1: ... 'pointer to void' ... */
25 sink((void *)0 + 0);
26
27 /* expect+1: ... 'pointer to void' ... */
28 sink(0 + (void *)0);
29
30 /* expect+1: ... 'int' ... */
31 sink(1 + 1);
32
33 /* expect+1: ... 'const int' ... */
34 sink((const int)1 + (volatile int)1);
35
36 /* expect+1: ... 'volatile int' ... */
37 sink((volatile int)1 + (const int)1);
38
39 long double _Complex cldbl = 0.0;
40 double _Complex cdbl = 0.0;
41 float _Complex cflt = 0.0f;
42 /* expect+1: error: invalid type for _Complex [308] */
43 _Complex invalid = 0.0;
44
45 /* expect+1: ... 'long double _Complex' ... */
46 sink(cldbl + 0);
47 /* expect+1: ... 'long double _Complex' ... */
48 sink(0 + cldbl);
49 /* expect+1: ... 'long double _Complex' ... */
50 sink(cldbl + cdbl);
51 /* expect+1: ... 'long double _Complex' ... */
52 sink(cdbl + cldbl);
53
54 /* expect+1: ... 'double _Complex' ... */
55 sink(cdbl + 0);
56 /* expect+1: ... 'double _Complex' ... */
57 sink(0 + cdbl);
58 /* expect+1: ... 'double _Complex' ... */
59 sink(cdbl + cflt);
60 /* expect+1: ... 'double _Complex' ... */
61 sink(cflt + cdbl);
62
63 /* expect+1: ... 'float _Complex' ... */
64 sink(cflt + 0);
65 /* expect+1: ... 'float _Complex' ... */
66 sink(0 + cflt);
67 /* expect+1: ... 'float _Complex' ... */
68 sink(cflt + (__uint128_t)0);
69 /* expect+1: ... 'float _Complex' ... */
70 sink((__uint128_t)0 + cflt);
71
72 /*
73 * The type specifier '_Complex' is only used during parsing, it does
74 * not make it to the expression.
75 */
76 /* expect+1: ... 'double _Complex' ... */
77 sink(invalid + 0);
78
79 /* expect+1: ... 'long double' ... */
80 sink(0.0L + 0);
81 /* expect+1: ... 'long double' ... */
82 sink(0 + 0.0L);
83 /* expect+1: ... 'long double' ... */
84 sink(0.0L + 0.0);
85 /* expect+1: ... 'long double' ... */
86 sink(0.0 + 0.0L);
87
88 /* expect+1: ... 'double' ... */
89 sink(0.0 + 0);
90 /* expect+1: ... 'double' ... */
91 sink(0 + 0.0);
92 /* expect+1: ... 'double' ... */
93 sink(0.0 + 0.0f);
94 /* expect+1: ... 'double' ... */
95 sink(0.0f + 0.0);
96
97 /* expect+1: ... 'float' ... */
98 sink(0.0f + 0);
99 /* expect+1: ... 'float' ... */
100 sink(0 + 0.0f);
101 /* expect+1: ... 'float' ... */
102 sink(0.0f + (__uint128_t)0);
103 /* expect+1: ... 'float' ... */
104 sink((__uint128_t)0 + 0.0f);
105
106 /* expect+1: ... 'unsigned long long' ... */
107 sink(0ULL + 0);
108 /* expect+1: ... 'unsigned long long' ... */
109 sink(0 + 0ULL);
110
111 /* expect+1: ... 'unsigned long long' ... */
112 sink(0ULL + 0LL);
113 /* expect+1: ... 'unsigned long long' ... */
114 sink(0LL + 0ULL);
115
116 /* If the bit-width is the same, prefer the unsigned variant. */
117 /* expect+1: ... 'unsigned long long' ... */
118 sink(0UL + 0LL);
119 /* expect+1: ... 'unsigned long long' ... */
120 sink(0LL + 0UL);
121
122 /*
123 * Ensure that __int128_t is listed in the integer ranks. This table
124 * only becomes relevant when both operands have the same width.
125 */
126 /* expect+1: ... '__uint128_t' ... */
127 sink((__uint128_t)1 + (__int128_t)1);
128 /* expect+1: ... '__uint128_t' ... */
129 sink((__int128_t)1 + (__uint128_t)1);
130 }
131